The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical AntiquityRosenbaum, Julius
History
The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical Antiquity
Rosenbaum, Julius
Sexually transmitted diseases -- History
Now having made it clear by what we have said, that in order to gain
knowledge of a disease in Antiquity it is by no means enough to go to
the Physicians only, even when such existed, that the latter should
never be regarded as sole possessors of whatever was known from the
point of view of pathology and therapeutics, we are bound to apply
the same rule in the case of diseases consequent upon vicious habits.
Of this the foregoing Sections contain amply sufficient proofs. It has
there been shown how the genital organs were under the protection of
special deities. Diseases affecting them were ascribed to the vengeance
of the said deities, as at Athens to Dionysus, at Lampsacus to Priapus.
To them sufferers had recourse to win by their prayers the removal of
the divine anger, as well as its consequences; and all this happened
not only in times when Physicians did not as yet exist, but no less
when they did and in defiance of them, as the poems of the Priapeia
sufficiently prove.[270] How long these ideas lived on is shown by the
pictures _Philo_ (p. 315) and _Palladius_ (p. 318) draw of their times,
while the XVth. and XVIth. Centuries reproduced the same scenes.
The most obvious reason for this no doubt was the _enigma presented
by the origin_ of diseases of the genitals, particularly for any one
unacquainted with the existence of contagions and their modes of
activity. The man who with a healthy penis had accomplished coition,
observed some days afterwards, though without resenting the fact, a
mucous discharge to have been set up, or an ulcer, pustule, or what
not, to have appeared. The cause of these affections he sought for in
vain, for of course the mere act of coition was the very last thing he
was likely to regard as such. Rather accustomed, wherever the cause of
any phænomenon was unknown to him, to ascribe it to the intervention
of the deity, he saw in his complaint likewise the Θεῖον (divine) as
eventual cause. Naturally therefore it was divine assistance, and
not human, that would avail to relieve him of his pain. Long after
this time moreover, when men had ceased to refer all diseases to the
vengeance of the gods, and now discovered natural causes for maladies
of the genitals, as for other diseases, anything rather than just
the act of coition was looked upon as cause of the observed effects,
as indeed is the case to this day among the Turks,[271] and as the
earliest Writers on Venereal disease abundantly show to have been so
in their time. That the Physicians were no exceptions to this rule, we
shall show on a later page.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account