The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical AntiquityRosenbaum, Julius
History
The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical Antiquity
Rosenbaum, Julius
Sexually transmitted diseases -- History
A much more weighty reason however why the patient attacked by some
affection of the genitals turned not to men (Physicians) for help, but
to the Gods, and the Priests who represented them, was the feeling of
_shame_. Since first Adam and Eve had recourse to the fig-leaf, it has
ever been a habit among all peoples of the ancient as of the modern
world to withdraw the procreative parts from the view of others by
covering them. But above all did the Ancients regard the exposure of
these parts[272] one of the severest trials to which modesty could be
exposed; and rightly enough therefore designate them by the name of
_pudenda_, αἰδοῖα, _the parts of shame_. Neither the wide extension of
Phallic worship, nor yet the compulsory exposure of the Ephebi[273] and
the naked exercises of maidens and youths at Sparta[274], can fairly
be cited in this connexion as proofs to the contrary.
In our own day the most accomplished voluptuaries are in no wise
shocked at undertaking in secret the most shameful doings, but yet
when it comes to showing the Physician the diseased instruments of
their bestial lusts, often put this off so long as to run great risks
of entirely losing the signs of their manhood; and without a doubt it
was the same at the period when habitual depravity had reached its
culminating point of enormity. Even Priapus himself asks (Carm. 3):
Nec mihi sit crimen, quod mentula semper operta est.
(Nor let it be laid as a crime against me, that my member is ever
covered up.) If with this is compared the poem from the Priapeia
quoted on p. 74 of Vol. I., no one can fail to agree with us when we
say that the field of observation open to Physicians in Antiquity
with regard to diseases of the genitals can never have been at all
extended. Even the Priests, at any rate in later times, were only
resorted to in the more serious instances; but even so their journals
of cases, supposing them ever to have kept such, would have been a far
better source of information than those of the Physicians. We find a
confirmation of this in the Mosaic Books of the Law, which contain the
earliest and clearest delineations we possess of affections of the
genital organs both in men and women.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account