The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical AntiquityRosenbaum, Julius
History
The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical Antiquity
Rosenbaum, Julius
Sexually transmitted diseases -- History
But as a matter of fact the public itself was no less careful to
guard the secret, as we gather from _Martial_,[278] as well as from
the fact that _Galen_ felt himself constrained even in his day to
compose a special Treatise on dissimulated diseases. This sort of
intentional deception on the part of patients was so much the easier,
as Physicians in those times, as said above, in virtue of their
pathological views,—some of which indeed may very well have originated
in this way,—were little accessible to the truth. For these reasons
they deserved, at any rate to some degree, the satiric lash of Martial;
and were very generally ridiculed by the more discerning of the laity.
This comes out in the important words of _Appuleius_ (Metamorph.
X. 211.) as follows: “Crederes et illam fluctuare tantum vaporibus
febrium: nisi quod et flebat: _Heu medicorum ignavae mentes!_ Quid
venae pulsus, quid caloris intemperantia, quid fatigatus anhelitus
et utrimque secus iactatae crebriter laterum mutuae vicissitudines?
_Dii boni! Quam facilis, licet non artifici medico, cuivis tamen docto
venereae cupidinis comprehensio_, cum videas aliquem sine corporis
calore flagrantem.” (Could you imagine her so tempest-tossed by the
vapours of mere fever,—not to mention that she kept forever crying:
“_Oh! the sorry wits of doctors!_” What means the throbbing vein,
the excessive temperature, the labouring breath, and the hurried
interchange of heaving flank, panting now on one side now on the other?
_Great heavens! how easy the diagnosis, not of course for a medical
expert, but for any one learned in the symptoms of love_, when you see
a person burning, yet without bodily fever-heat).
But does all this justify us in casting a stone at our medical
colleagues of Ancient times? For the last three hundred years we
imagine ourselves clearly acquainted with Venereal disease and all its
forms; yet how many a bubo has been mistaken for a strangulated hernia,
anal callosity, or the like, how many a case of vaginal gonorrhœa
for simple _fluor albus_ (white discharge, leucorrhœa), how many a
condyloma on the posteriors for hæmorrhoidal swellings, and accordingly
not treated as the physician in _Juvenal_, _medico ridente_ (the
physician grinning the while), treated them,—that is duly cut away or
ligatured?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account