The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical AntiquityRosenbaum, Julius
History
The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical Antiquity
Rosenbaum, Julius
Sexually transmitted diseases -- History
Whether there were other factors as well to induce the old Physicians
to apply the ordinary treatment of ulcers in general to those of the
genital organs, we cannot indeed as yet for the time being determine.
Certainly the conjecture is an obvious one that they may well have
had an inkling of the specific nature of such ulcers, and that it
was not merely the local mischief they sought to put a stop to by
early application of cautery and knife. However it is only further
and more careful investigations that must be allowed to decide the
point,—the more so, as the general _views as to the formation of
ulcers_ held by the Ancients seem in many respects to tell against it.
Thus _Galen_[287] says: “The mode in which these (ulcers involving
destruction of substance) are set up however is twofold; they arise
either by removal of surrounding tissue (ἐκ περιαιρέσεως) or by eating
away (ἐξ ἀναβρώσεως). How the former acts is well known. As to the
eating away, if it proceed from the inward parts of the organism, it
is an outcome of the evil humours; but if it arise from outside, then
it is a result of the physician’s remedial measures or of fire.” From
this we gather that all ulcers of the genitals, as well as others,
which did not result from the action either of remedial measures or of
fire, were held as being necessarily an outcome of the evil humours
of the body. Further, that this view was not in any way peculiar
to the time of Galen, but was a direct and necessary consequence
of the further development of the pathology of “humours,” follows
from the circumstance that we find the same opinion expressed by
_Hippocrates_.[288] Again _Plato_ shared the latter author’s general
doctrine of _apostasis_ (suppurative inflammation taking off evil
humours) in his “Timaeus”, where he derives from the white phlegm,
striking outwards to the skin, cutaneous eruptions, rashes and the like
maladies, from the acrid, salty phlegm on the other hand the fluxes of
all types, bearing different names according to the different parts of
the body affected.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account