The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical AntiquityRosenbaum, Julius
History
The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical Antiquity
Rosenbaum, Julius
Sexually transmitted diseases -- History
pro Domo ch. 18., says to
Sextus Clodius: _ligurris_ (you are a licker), and ch. 31. Quaere hoc
ex Sexto Clodio, iube adesse, latitat omnino; sed si requiri iusseris,
invenient hominem apud sororem tuam (Publii Clodii) _occultantem se
capite demisso_ (Require this of Sextus Clodius, bid him appear; he
lurks entirely out of sight. But if once you order him to be sought
out, they will find the man at your sister’s house (Publius Clodius’s)
_hiding himself with head held down_.) Comp. _Catullus_, 87. In
_Martial_, Bk. IV. Epigr. 53., _canis_ is used in same sense as κύων
in Greek,—apparently? Perhaps the women of Antiquity made use of dogs
as well to serve as _cunnilingues_. According to _Brockhusius_ on
Tibullus I. 7. 32., II. 4. 32. they were usual companions of “ladies of
pleasure” at Rome, whence too _suburanae canes_ (bitches of the Subura)
in _Horace_, Epod. V. 58. and _Subura vigilax_ (the watchful Subura)
in _Propertius_, IV. 7. 15. During the Middle Ages at any rate such an
employment of dogs was nothing unusual. This is stated by _Panormita_,
Hermaph. Epigr. XXX., Epitaphium Nichinae Flandrensis, Scorti egregii:—
Pelvis erat cellae in medio, qua saepe lavabar,
Lambebat madidum blanda catella femur.
(Epitaph on Nichette the Fleming, a famous Harlot:—There stood a basin
in middle of the chamber, in which I would many a time wash myself, the
while my fawning bitch-pup licked her mistress’s dripping thigh).
and Epigr. XXXVII.,
Te viset Jannecta, sua comitante catella,
Blanda canis dominae est, est hera blanda viris.
(Jeannette shall visit you, her bitch-pup accompanying her; complacent
is the hound to its mistress, the lady complacent to men).
[57] _Galen_, De simplic. medicament. temperamentis ac facultat. Bk. X.
ch. 1., edit. Kühn Vol. XII. p. 249.
[58] κοπροφάγος (Excrement-Eater). To this _Martial_, bk. III. Epigr.
77., seems to allude, when he says:
Nescio quod stomachi vitium secretius esse
Suspicor, ut quid enim, Baetice, _saprofagis_?
(I suspect there exists some secret vitiation of the stomach; else why,
Baeticus, do you _eat putrid meat_?)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account