The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical AntiquityRosenbaum, Julius
History
The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical Antiquity
Rosenbaum, Julius
Sexually transmitted diseases -- History
(Verily for me you shall be judge over earth and the Red Sea to boot
and all the realm of Ecbatana, _licking up_ comfit-cakes,—? pickles).
Here ἐπίπαστα is, as probably also in v. 103., the Salgama (pickles
in brine) of _Ausonius_, Epigr. 125.; which moreover affords at any
rate a partial explanation of the passage in _Pollux_, Onomast. bk.
VI. ch. 9. p. 61., bk. X. ch. 24. p. 96. Still, even if according to
this _Phoenicia_ were used in the sense of the genital organs of women
at time of menstruation, it by no means follows that φοινικίζειν meant
_only_ to have dealings with women in menstruation, any more than it
does that it is identical with καταμηνίου πίνων (drinking of menstrual
blood), as it has been shown just above not to be. In fact _Galen_ says
explicitly: φαίνεταί μοι παραπλήσιον, (it appears to me to be something
_similar!_)
[63] _Seneca_, De beneficiis bk. IV. ch. 31.
[64] _Seneca_, Epist. 87.
[65] _Galen_, Works, edit. Kühn, Vol. XIX. p. 153.
[66] _Naumann_, Handb. der Klinik (Text-book of Clinical Medicine),
Vol. 7. p. 88.
[67] The author at any rate is more cautious than _Sprengel_, who
(_Th. Batemann_), Prakt. Darstellung der Hautkrankheiten (Practical
Exposition of Diseases of the Skin), Halle 1815., p. 427. Note, writes:
“Hippocrates appears to mention it (Elephantiasis) under the name
φοινικίη νόσος (Phoenician disease), which _Galen_ (Explan. voc. Hipp.)
_distinctly and definitely_ explains as Elephantiasis.”
[68] _Hippocrates_, edit. Kühn Vol. I. pp. 223, 233., Λειχῆνες δὲ
καὶ λέπραι καὶ λεῦκαι, οἷσι μὲν νέοισιν ἢ παισὶν ἐοῦσιν ἐγένετό τι
τούτων, ἢ κατὰ μικρὸν φανὲν αὔξεται ἐν πολλῷ χρόνῳ, τούτοισι μὲν οὐ χρὴ
ἀπόστασιν νομίζειν τὸ ἐξάνθημα, ἀλλὰ νόσημα· οἷσι δὲ ἐγένετο τούτων
τι πολύ τε καὶ ἐξαπίνης, τοῦτο ἂν εἴη ἀπόστησις· γίνονται δὲ λεῦκαι
μὲν ἐκ τῶν _θανατωδεστάτων_ νοσημάτων, οἷον καὶ ἡ _νοῦσος ἡ φθινικὴ_
καλεομένη. αἱ δὲ λέπραι καὶ οἱ λειχῆνες ἐκ τῶν μελαγχολικῶν. ἰῆσθαι δὲ
τουτέων εὐπετέστερά ἐστιν ὅσα νεωτάτοισί τε γίνεται καὶ νεώτατά ἐστι,
καὶ τοῦ σώματος ἐν τοῖσι μαλθακωτάτοισι καὶ σαρκωδεστάτοισι φύεται.
(for translation see text above).
[69] _J. W. Wedel_, Progr. de Morbo phoeniceo Hippocratis, (Graduation
Exercise on the Phœnician disease of Hippocrates), Jena 1702. 4to.,
reprinted in _E. G. Baldinger_, Selecta doctorum virorum opuscula in
quibus Hippocrates explicatur, denuo edita, (Select Tracts of Learned
Men dealing with the Interpretation of Hippocrates,—Second ed.),
Göttingen 1782., pp. 215-222. The Author does not seem to be really
self-consistent; he wavers between Elephantiasis and Purpura.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account