The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical AntiquityRosenbaum, Julius
History
The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical Antiquity
Rosenbaum, Julius
Sexually transmitted diseases -- History
[73] _Pollux_, Onomast IV. ch. 25. p. 187., mentions among forms of
wasting-diseases φθίνης νόσος, for which some editors, and quite
rightly, prefer to read φθίνας νόσος (wasting disease). _Suidas_ also
says φθίνας ἡ νόσος, but without giving any further explanation; on the
contrary in _Hesychius_ we find: s. v. φθινὰ[ς] ἡ ἐρυσίβη, καὶ εἶδος
ἐλαίας (under word φθινὰ; the red blight, also a species of olive). But
by ἐρυσίβη is signified _mildew_, _blight_, _smut on grain_, the same
thing therefore as the Romans called _rubigo_ or _robigo_, on which
_Servius_, on Virg. Georg. I. 151., has the following observation:
Robigo genus est vitii, quo culmi pereunt, quod a rusticanis calamitas
dicitur. Hoc autem genus vitii ex nebula nasci solet, cum _nigrescunt
et consumuntur_ frumenta. Inde Robigus deus et sacra eius septimo
Kalendas Maias Robigalia appellantur. Sed _haec abusive_ robigo
dicitur; nam _proprie robigo est_, ut Varro dicit, _vitium obscoenae
libidinis quod ulcus vocatur: id autem abundantia et superfluitate
humoris_ solet nasci, quae Graece σατυρίασις dicitur. (_Robigo_ is a
sort of blight, that kills the corn-stalks, which is spoken of as a
_disaster_ by the peasants. Now this kind of blight commonly springs
from a mist or exhalation, the crops blackening and being burnt up.
Hence the god Robigus, and his feast-day on the seventh day before
the Kalends of May (April 24.), known as the Robigalia. But this is
called _robigo_ only by a misnomer; for properly speaking _robigo_
is, as Varro says, a vitiation due to abominable licentiousness and
is called an ulcer, and it commonly springs from that abundance and
over-copiousness of the humour, which in Greek is called Satyriasis).
These words are for our purpose pose of the highest importance,
teaching us as they do, that _a distinctive form of ulceration, that
the patient had brought on himself by sexual excesses, was not only
familiar among the Romans_ but actually bore the _special_ name of
_robigo_. It must have displayed a distinctive redness, and have
consumed the parts affected similarly to the smut or rust of grain,
or the rust of iron. It is surely a sufficient indication to call the
chancre-ulcer a blight, a burning: Comp. anthrax, carbo (malignant
pustule, carbuncle). To this day in Germany it is vulgarly said of any
one attacked by the primary forms of Venereal disease, “the man has
burned himself”. _Festus_, (edit. Dacier p. 451.) says: _Robum_ rubro
colore et quae rufo significare, at bovem quoque rustici appellant,
manifestum est, unde et _materia quae plurimas venas eius coloris
habet_ dicta est rubor, (_Robus_ clearly indicates things of a red
or reddish colour,—now countrymen even speak of an ox as _robus_;
hence _any substance having manifold veins of this colour_ is called
_rubor_). Now such is habitually the case with the penis attacked by
phimosis or paraphimosis and under the morbid condition of constant
erection (Satyriasis) superinduced by these.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account