We now take up playful apperception of new impressions. The deep-rooted
impulse to bring everything within the sphere of our own powers is
especially powerful in the presence of novelty, of what is unfamiliar.
We experience an almost irresistible desire to examine closely any
strange object and make ourselves acquainted with its properties.
Curiosity is the name given to the playful manifestation of attention
which results from this tendency. Since I introduced it among the plays
in my work on animals I have been told that curiosity is no play; but
if we keep to our principle that the exercise of an impulse merely for
the sake of the pleasure we derive from it is to be called play, then
I am unable to see why curiosity should form an exception. It stands
midway between two kinds of perception as applied to what is new, but
is identical with neither. On one side is the impulse to inquire into
the practical use of the unfamiliar object, whether it is beneficial
or injurious; on the other side is thirst for knowledge, not entirely
with a view to appropriation, but more concerned with placing the
object properly in our system of things known. But curiosity, while it
does depend on the stimulus[323] of novelty, concerns itself primarily
neither with the practical value of the thing nor with its theoretic
significance. It simply enjoys the agreeable emotional effects which
arise when a new concept does not readily adjust itself to the beaten
track of the habitual, and requires paths at least partially new to be
opened before it. The interest attaching to scientific investigation
is logical and formal, but that excited by curiosity may be said to
be material. The freshness of the untried belongs to this new mental
heritage, and is as exhilarating as the mountain climber’s discovery
of a new path to some coveted summit. Where such pleasure becomes the
ground of activity, that activity is play. For illustrative purposes
let us suppose a landslide. Practical interest would at once apply to
the proper authorities to find out the extent of damage caused by the
catastrophe; scientific and learned curiosity would investigate the
causes; while the simply curious would run from all directions just to
see what was happening, using their powers of attention playfully.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account