Only in connection with chance, then, can Reason find
in cards a task worthy of her powers, and, indeed, a small prize is
a stimulus sometimes needed to keep up our interest. This may be a
suitable place to mention that it was formerly the custom to play for
money or some stake with all games of chance and even with chess.
I close this review of contests which are purely intellectual with
two brief remarks, the first of which concerns the invention of board
games. It is difficult to find a perfectly satisfactory answer to
the question of their origin. However, their complication points to
adults rather than children as their probable inventors, and to me
the following consideration seems important: The primitive races, who
find it difficult to convey their thoughts in speech, naturally take
to marking on the sand, and hence the figures might arise.[401] If the
leader of one of the more intelligent peoples wished to instruct them
concerning some past or future combat, it would be a simple method
of illustrating his meaning to draw an outline on the ground and
represent the position of the hostile forces by small stones or similar
objects whose movements would symbolize the manœuvres of the forces
or the advances of knights for single combat. This would, no doubt,
be exceedingly interesting to those conducting it, and also to the
spectators, and might easily be repeated for the sake of the amusement
afforded until some inventive genius turned it into a veritable play
with board and men. To show that there is nothing improbable in this
supposition we may point to the fact that such play is actually carried
on by our own officers (Italian, _manovra sulla carta_).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account