Thirdly—and this point will be quickly disposed of—when is imitation
to be regarded as play? Evidently we must apply the psychological
criterion; imitation is a play when it is enjoyed for its own
sake.[540] Imitation transcends play at its highest and lowest
limits. Simple reflex reactions, such as gaping when another gapes,
fleeing because another has fled, etc., can not be called play in
a psychological sense, nor is the child’s first reproduction of
sounds playful. Only when he repeats the performance from enjoyment
of his success can we be sure of the thing from a psychological
standpoint.[541] The limit is passed in the other direction by
rendering the movements mechanical, so that the imitation is performed
involuntarily, no longer affording enjoyment of the act itself, as
it is now directed toward the external aim. Here belong imitative
teaching (so far as it is not in itself enjoyable) and the imitation
of an exemplary personality or ideal which is so important to ethics.
In the latter, however, a suggestion of playfulness is sometimes
present, though it would seem that nothing could be further from the
proper sphere of ethics; when poetic figures serve as models, however,
it is sometimes hard to mark the limit between the serious and the
playful.[542]
In conclusion, I would remark that imitation is almost never merely
that; it is creation as well, production as well as reproduction. Close
on the heels of imitation comes imagination, and that in the double
meaning of the word which we have learned to know. Imagination expands
the copy into a full likeness of the original, and then creates the
illusion that it is the original. However, imitation may actually
be new creation. As Baldwin lucidly puts it, the child’s persistent
imitation calls into the arena with the satisfactory copy a host of new
combinations which may be non-essential to this special aim, but which
claim the child’s attention and interest as discoveries of his own.
He is often so interested in these unexpected combinations as to lose
sight of his original purpose, and runs to his parents or comrades to
show what he can do.[543]
In turning to the consideration of imitative plays I prefer to divide
them into the following groups for the sake of convenience. First,
I shall speak of playful imitation of simple movements, which are
preparatory to more complicated processes, distinguishing between
optical and acoustic percepts. Then follow two important specialized
groups, namely, the dramatic and plastic or constructive imitation; and
finally I shall treat inner imitation as a fourth kind of play.
1. _Playful Imitation of Simple Movements_
(_a_) Optical Percepts
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account