The Pleistocene of North America: and its vertebrated animals from the states east of the Mississippi River and from the Canadian provinces east of longitude 95°Hay, Oliver Perry
Science
The Pleistocene of North America: and its vertebrated animals from the states east of the Mississippi River and from the Canadian provinces east of longitude 95°
Hay, Oliver Perry
Paleontology -- North America; Paleontology -- Pleistocene; Vertebrates, Fossil
7. _Sixteen miles southeast of Newbern, Pamlico County._—On the left
bank of Neuse River, at a point said to be 16 miles below Newbern,
several vertebrate fossils were collected many years ago. The collection
appears to have been made by the botanist Nuttall; but the first mention
found by the writer is a paper by H. B. Croom, in 1835 (Amer. Jour.
Sci., ser. 1, vol. XXVII, pp. 168–171). He stated that the locality was
on the north bank of Neuse River, on the land of Mr. Benners, who had
dug several pits in order to obtain marl. In these pits, some reaching a
depth of 25 feet, many fossil shells, sharks’ teeth, and bones of marine
fishes were found. These marls appear to belong to the Pleistocene
(Stephenson, North Carolina Geol. and Econom. Surv., vol. III, p. 289).
In the same pits were found teeth and bones of various Pleistocene
mammals. A few of the fossils, as the great shark tooth, certainly
belonged to Tertiary deposits. Croom states that there were fragments of
the horns of a fossil elk; also a mastodon tooth which had a breadth of
7 inches and a depth of 9.5 inches. It is not improbable that this was a
tooth of an elephant. Teeth, supposed to belong to a fossil elk and
which had a breadth of 3 inches and a depth of 4.5 inches, were probably
hindermost milk molars of _Mammut americanum_. Harlan (Amer. Jour. Sci.,
vol. XLIII, 1842, p. 143) indicated that he had seen in the collection
made by Nuttall remains of the mastodon; also of a supposed _Sus_, an
elephant, elk, deer, horse, seal, cetaceans, a tortoise, shark, skate,
snake, and fish. This collection apparently passed into the hands of T.
A. Conrad. J. W. Foster (Proc. Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., vol. X, p. 166)
stated that Conrad had many years previously obtained these animals near
Newbern. Besides those mentioned he included a hippopotamus. This
identification was probably based on milk tusks or lower tusks of the
mastodon.
8. _Harlowe, Carteret County._—In 1828 (Amer. Jour. Sci., vol. XIII, p.
348), Elisha Mitchell wrote that in digging the Clubfoot and Harlowe
Canal, remains of both the elephant and the mastodon had been found.
Under this number may be mentioned the finding of a jaw of a mastodon in
the Inland Waterway Canal, which appears to run some miles east of the
old Clubfoot and Harlowe Canal. This specimen is, or was recently, in
the laboratory of the U. S. Fish Commission at Beaufort.
9. _Pitt County._—In 1871 (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., p. 113), Leidy
reported that an isolated lower last molar tooth of _Mammut americanum_,
but accompanied by the jaw, had been obtained in Pitt County. No more
exact locality was mentioned. In the U. S. National Museum (No. 202) is
a lower right hindermost molar which was found in Pitt County.
10. _Wilson County._—From Professor H. H. Brimley the writer learned
that there are in the museum at Raleigh some remains of mastodon from
Wilson County. The writer has seen at Raleigh a lower second left molar,
from Wilson County.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account