The thickness, smoothness, color and manner of exfoliation of the
outer bark and the color of the inner bark have considerable value in
determining species but are little used in determining horticultural
groups. It is well recognized that all plums have lighter colored bark
in the South than in the North. The branches are very characteristic in
several species. The length, thickness and rigidity of the branch and
the length of its internodes should be considered, while the direction
of the branch, whether straight or zigzag, are very valuable determining
characters and relatively stable ones, seeming to change for most part
only through long ranges of climatic conditions. So, too, the arming
of a branch with spines or spurs and the structure of such organs are
important. The color, smoothness, amount of pubescence, direction,
length, thickness and the appearance of the lenticels, the presence of
excrescences on the branchlets of the first and second year’s growth and
the branching angle, are all worthy of consideration though quite too
much has been made of these characters, especially of pubescence, in
determining species, for they are all extremely variable.
[Illustration:
1. _P. HORTULANA MINERI_
2. _P. AMERICANA_
3. _P. CERASIFERA_
4. _P. DOMESTICA_
5. _P. INSITITIA_
6. _P. HORTULANA_
7. _P. MUNSONIANA_
8. _P. NIGRA_
9. _P. TRIFLORA_]
The size, shape and color of leaf-buds and of their outer and inner
scales and the margins of the scales differ in different species.
Possibly the most evident, and therefore readiest means of identifying
species, at least, is by the leaves. It is true that leaves are
very variable but always within limits, and either individually
or collectively in giving the general aspect to a tree they are
characteristic. Modifications of leaves most often occur in very young
plants, those growing in bright sunshine or deep shade and on sprouts
or suckers, but none of these are usually sufficient to mislead as to
species. Leaf-size and leaf-form are the first characters to be noted in
determining a plum but these are closely followed in value by leaf-color,
leaf-surface, leaf-thickness and leaf-margin. Leaf-size is variable,
depending much upon the conditions noted above but leaf-form varies but
little in the several species. So, too, the color of leaves is very
constant throughout a species, for both surfaces, though impossible
to describe accurately in words and very difficult to reproduce in
color-printing. There is a marked difference in autumnal tints not
only of species but of varieties but these are not very constant in
any one location and must vary greatly under different environments.
The thickness of the leaves of the several species is a distinctive
character. Species of plums have very different leaf-surfaces as regards
reticulation, rugoseness, pubescence and coriaceousness, all of these
characters being quite constant, though it is to be noted that roughness
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account