The stone of the plum is usually compressed, longer than broad, smooth
or roughened, thickish and with an acute margin along the ventral suture
and thinnish or grooved on the dorsal suture. The stone of the cherry
is usually globular, always much thickened, smooth or a very little
roughened, ridged and grooved on the ventral suture, with a thin,
scarcely raised sharp margin on the dorsal suture. The stone of the
apricot is similar to that of the plum though thicker walled, with a more
conspicuous winged margin, and is sometimes pitted. The stone of the
peach is compressed, usually with very thick walls, much roughened and
deeply pitted. In the almond the stone resembles in general characters
the peach-stone, but all almond shells are more or less porous and often
fibrous on the inner surfaces. The stone is the part for which the almond
is cultivated and is most variable, the chief differences being that some
have thick hard shells and others thin soft shells.
The leaves of plums are convolute, or rolled up, in the bud. Cherry,
peach and almond leaves are conduplicate, that is are folded lengthwise
along the midrib in bud while the leaves of the apricot, like those of
the plum, are convolute. The manner in which the leaves are packed in the
bud is a fine mark of distinction in stone-fruits. In size and shape of
leaves, as well as in the finer marks of these organs, the botanist and
pomologist find much to aid in distinguishing species and varieties but
little that holds in separating the sub-genera. The last statement holds
true with the floral organs also.
The near affinity of the stone-fruits is further shown by the fact that
plums and apricots, plums and cherries, and the several species of each
of the distinct fruits inter-hybridize without much difficulty. It is
a fact well-known that hybrids often surpass their parents in vigor of
plant and in productiveness and this has proved true with most of the
hybrids in Prunus of which we have accounts, thereby giving promise of
improved forms of these plants through hybridizing. The great variation
in wild and cultivated native plums is possibly due to more or less
remote hybridity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account