The plurality of the human racePouchet, G. (Georges)
Philosophy
The plurality of the human race
Pouchet, G. (Georges)
Monogenism and polygenism
[53] After having said that the idea of good and evil (_moralité_)
exists among all men, M. de Quatrefages adds, that “the notion of the
Divinity and that of another life are also generally diffused” (_Unité
de l’Espèce Humaine_, p. 23). We shall demonstrate further on (chap. v)
that this statement is incorrect, and how fragile the bases are upon
which M. de Quatrefages rests the _fundamental_ characteristics which,
according to him, distinguish the human kingdom.
[54] M. Chevreul has already defined the “Beautiful” as “the expression
of causes whose influence has most force in moving mankind by appealing
to their senses” (_Lettres à M. Villemain sur la Méthode_, 1856, p.
169).
[55] [“Truth lies at the bottom of a well,” is an old saying, but our
author does not seem to agree with it. We should be very sorry to think
that truth was only to be found in science. This is, doubtless, the
opinion of a great many learned men at the present day; but we must
candidly own we do not agree with it, and certainly are not able to
endorse M. Pouchet’s sentiment. We have ourselves not arrived at the
point, and in this we are, doubtless, old-fashioned,--of referring
everything to “reason,” as opposed to faith.--EDITOR.]
[56] _Edinburgh Journal of Science_, 1828, vol. ix, p. 10.
[57] _Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences_, vol. iii, p. 29.
[58] We can compare this passage from the naturalist philosopher with
the other quotations we made farther back. “Females are extremely
curious about this spectacle (the fondness of a “mother” monkey for
her young one), and doubtless their attention is caused by discovering
therein a true manifestation of the feelings they have themselves
experienced as mothers; they are, above all things, astonished to
recognise in these ardent attentions the joy and pride of maternity, of
which they believed themselves alone to be susceptible.” (É. Geoffroy
Saint-Hilaire, _Cours d’Histoire Naturelle des Mammifères_, Paris,
1829, vol. i; Lesson, vi, p. 16).
[59] Proudhon has already laid down as a principle the establishment
of a psychology among animals (_De la Justice_, vol. ii, p. 279).
Frederick Cuvier has done the same.
[60] Hom. iv _in Acta Apostolorum_. See Rechtenbach, _De Sermone
Brutorum_, Erfurt, 1706, p. 1.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account