The Pneumatic Despatch Tube System of the Batcheller Pneumatic Tube Co.: Also, Facts and General Information Relating to Pneumatic Despatch TubesBatcheller, Birney C. (Birney Clark)
History
The Pneumatic Despatch Tube System of the Batcheller Pneumatic Tube Co.: Also, Facts and General Information Relating to Pneumatic Despatch Tubes
Batcheller, Birney C. (Birney Clark)
Pneumatic-tube transportation
In operating large tubes, that is to say, tubes six or eight inches
in diameter, there is an advantage in using compressed, rather than
exhausted air, in the construction of the sending and receiving
apparatus, especially when the tubes are very long. With an ample
supply of compressed air always at hand, the air-cushions can be made
shorter and more effective in bringing the carriers quickly to rest.
With exhausted air the cushions are ineffective, and consequently
must be made very long in order to stop the carrier before it strikes
the closed end of the tube. This does not apply to small tubes where
the carriers are so light that they can be stopped without injury by
allowing them to strike solid buffers. Again, when compressed air is
used, we have a larger difference in pressure between the pressure in
the tube and the atmosphere to operate our mechanism by cylinders and
pistons. With an exhaust system carriers are not so easily ejected
from the tubes of the receiving apparatus; we could not use the simple
form of open receiver. Again, if the tubes are laid in wet ground, and
a leak occurs in any of the joints, water will be drawn in if air is
being exhausted from the tube, while it will be kept out if compressed
air is used.
In regard to the question of relative economy of the two systems, we
will say that when long tubes are used, requiring high pressures, or,
more strictly speaking, a large difference of pressure, to maintain the
desired velocity of air-current, there seems to be some advantage in
using an exhaust system. The reason is this: the friction of the air in
the tube, which absorbs most of the power, increases as the air becomes
heavier and more dense. When the air is exhausted from the tube, we
are using a current of rarefied air, and this moves through the tube
with less friction and, consequently, a higher velocity, for the same
difference of pressure, than the more dense compressed air. But for
short tubes that require only a small difference of pressure, this
advantage becomes very small, and is overbalanced by other advantages
of a compressed air system. So, taking everything into consideration,
there is not so much to be said in favor of an exhaust system.
=Laws Expressed in Mathematical Formulæ.=—While we have heretofore
purposely avoided all complicated mathematical formulæ, it may not
be out of place here to give a few of the more simple relations that
exist between the pressure, velocity, length and diameter of the tubes,
etc. In two tubes having the same diameter, with the same pressures
maintained at each end, but of different lengths, the mean velocities
of the air in the tubes will bear the inverse ratio to the square
roots of the lengths of the tubes. This is expressed by the following
proportion:
_u_ : U :: √L : √_l_
_u_ and U represent the mean velocities of the air in the two tubes and
_l_ and L the respective lengths of tubes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account