The pneumatics of Hero of AlexandriaHero, of Alexandria
History
The pneumatics of Hero of Alexandria
Hero, of Alexandria
Discoveries in science -- History; Inventions -- History; Pneumatics
Now some writers have given the above explanation of the action of the
siphon, saying that the longer leg, holding more, attracts the shorter.
But that such an explanation is incorrect, and that he who believes so
would be greatly mistaken if he were to attempt to raise water from a
lower level, we may prove as follows. Let there be a siphon with its
inner leg longer and narrow, and the outer much less in length but
broader so as to contain more water than the longer leg. Then, having
first filled the siphon with water, plunge the longer leg into a vessel
of water or a well. Now, if we allow the water to flow, the outer leg,
containing more than the inner, should draw the water out of the longer
leg, which will at the same time draw up the water in the well; and
the discharge having begun will exhaust all the water or continue for
ever, since the liquid without is more than that within. But this is
not found to be the case; and therefore the alleged cause is not the
true one. Let us then examine into the natural cause. The surface of
every liquid body, when at rest, is spherical and concentric with that
of the earth; and, if the liquid be not at rest, it moves until it
attains such a surface. If then we take two vessels and pour water into
each, and, after filling the siphon and closing its extremities with
the fingers, insert one leg into one vessel plunging it beneath the
water, and the other into the other, all the water will be continuous,
for each of the liquids in the vessels communicates with that in the
siphon. If, then, the surfaces of the liquids in the vessels were at
the same level before, they will both remain at rest when the siphon is
plunged in. But if they were not, as soon as the water is continuous
it must inevitably flow into the lower vessel through the channel of
communication, until either all the water in both vessels stands at the
same height, or one of the vessels is emptied. Suppose that the liquids
stand at the same height; they will of course be at rest, so that the
liquid in the siphon will also be at rest. If, then, the siphon be
conceived to be intersected by a plane in the surface of the liquids in
the vessels, even now the liquid in the siphon will be at rest, and, if
raised without being inclined to either side, it will again be at rest,
and that, whether the siphon is of equal breadth throughout or one leg
is much larger than the other. For the reason why the liquid remained
at rest did not lie in this, but in the fact that the apertures of
the siphon were at the same level. The question now arises why, when
the siphon is raised, the water is not borne down by its own weight,
having beneath it air which is lighter than itself. The answer is that
a continuous void cannot exist; so that, if the water is to descend,
we must first fill the upper part of the siphon, into which no air
can possibly force its way. But if we pierce a hole in the upper part
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account