The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu ILinebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
History
The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu I
Linebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
Sun, Yat-sen, 1866-1925. San min zhu yi
This party had begun as a small group of the personal followers of Sun
Yat-sen in the days when he was struggling against the Manchu monarchy
almost singlehanded. Gradually this group increased and became a
federation of the great secret orders which had resisted the Manchus for
centuries. It developed into a modern parliamentary party under the name
_Kuomintang_—literally _nation people party_—with the inauguration of the
first republic, but was soon driven underground by the would-be emperor
Yüan Shih-k’ai. It emerged again in South China at the end of the World
War, was reorganized after the Communist model (so far as intra-party
organization was concerned) before the death of Sun Yat-sen, led the
revolution to the North, and, now, though somewhat less united than
before, rules the greater part of China in the name of the Three
Principles.(210)
Confucius preached the slow transformation of society by means of an
intellectual leaven, scholar class, which, by re-forming and clarifying
the ideology, could gradually minimize conflict among men and bring about
an epoch of concord in which all men would live by reason as found in
tradition. The function of the Kuomintang was, in Sun’s mind, only
remotely similar. The Kuomintang was designed to intervene in a chaos of
wars and corrupt politics, to propagate the nationalist ideology, and
avert a tragic fate which would otherwise be inevitable—the disappearance
of China from the map of the world, and the extinction not only of Chinese
civilization but—as Sun Yat-sen thought—of the Chinese race as well.
In the days before the downfall of the monarchy, and for the few years of
defeat under the first republic, the Kuomintang was not highly organized.
Sun Yat-sen’s genius for leadership, and the fervor of his adherents—which
can be understood only at first-hand, and cannot be explained in rational
terms—were sufficient to hold the party together. But there was far too
much discord as to final principles as well as to points of immediate
action, and party activities were not so specialized as to permit maximum
efficiency.(211) Furthermore, there was the question of the relations of
the party and the state. It was somewhat absurd for the partizans of Sun
Yat-sen, having brought about the revolution, to stand back and let
whomever would walk away with it. The party’s power had ebbed with its
success in 1911. There had to be some way of keeping the party in power
after it had achieved the overthrow of its enemies, and won the
revolutionary control of the country. Reorganization was definitely
necessary if party effectiveness were to be raised to the point of
guaranteeing the success of the next revolution—which Sun did not live to
see—and party supremacy to the point of assuring the Nationalists control
of the government after the revolution had been accomplished.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account