The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu ILinebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
History
The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu I
Linebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
Sun, Yat-sen, 1866-1925. San min zhu yi
Reorganization was effected through the assistance of the Communists
during the period of the Canton-Moscow entente (1923-1927).(212) Under the
leadership of the extraordinarily able Michael Borodin, the Soviet
advisers sent from Russia completely re-shaped the internal structure of
the Kuomintang and won for themselves positions of considerable confidence
and influence, which they lost only when they attempted to transform the
principles and objectives of the Party as thoroughly as they had the
organization.
The Kuomintang of today, which is irreconcilably opposed to Marxism, still
bears the imprint of Communist design.(213) Though the working details of
the Party organization do not, for the most part, appear directly relevant
to the principle of _min ch’üan_ of Sun Yat-sen, the arrangements for
Party control illustrate the curious compromise between Chinese and
Western democratic patterns, on the one hand, and the revolutionary
requirements of absolutism, on the other, which have made Chinese
republicanism seem a sham, if not a farce, to Western scholars who expect
to find in China the same openness and freedom in democratic government to
which they are accustomed at home.
During the life-time of Sun there was no question of an elective headship
for the Party. In spite of the fact that the party stood for democracy, it
seemed impossible that any alternative to Sun Yat-sen himself should be
considered. Sun Yat-sen’s complete willingness to continue as head of the
Party without troubling to have himself elected from time to time has been
variously interpreted: his friends term it the humble and natural
recognition of a celebrated fact; his enemies regard it as the
hallucination of an egotism as distorted as it was colossal. The truth
would appear to be that Sun regarded the initiation and the guidance of
the Nationalist revolution as his particular mission in life. He was, in a
sense, the intellectual proprietor of the Three Principles. Unselfish in
all personal matters, he had few doubts of his own capacity when he had
discovered what he believed to be his duty, and unquestioningly set out to
perform it. In the lawlessness and tumult of the revolution, it would have
seemed absurd for Sun Yat-sen to submit to the periodical formula of
reëlection for the sake of any merely theoretical harmony of action and
theory.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account