The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu ILinebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
History
The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu I
Linebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
Sun, Yat-sen, 1866-1925. San min zhu yi
Not only was Sun Yat-sen the leader of the Party; he was not even to have
a successor. The first revised constitution of the Kuomintang provided for
his life-time headship; the second stipulated that the post of _Tsung Li_
should never be filled by any other person. As _Tsung Li_—the Party
Leader, it is still customary to refer to Sun Yat-sen in China today.
This, again, was not the display of a superhuman vanity so much as a
practical requirement designed to offset the possibility of conflict and
intrigue among the most conspicuous party chiefs, which would quite
probably arise should the question of a succession to Sun Yat-sen ever be
mentioned. There was, of course, the element of respect in this
gesture—the implication that the magistral chair of Sun Yat-sen was too
high a place for any common man to sit.
So far as leadership was concerned the Kuomintang was an autocracy until
the death of Sun Yat-sen. In all other party matters attempts were made to
cultivate democratic form and instil democratic morale. The prudence of
this choice may seem to have been borne out by the course of history,
since the Communists did not become ambitious, nor the Nationalists
jealous, to the point of open conflict until after the death of Sun
Yat-sen. Western thought will have to make extensive allowances before it
can comprehend a democratic Party which operated under the unquestioned
authority of a single man, without recourse to the formula of a plebiscite
or election to a boss-ship in the form of a nominal post made significant
only by the personal conspicuousness of the incumbent.
Had Karl Marx lived to work in the Russian Revolution, he might have
occupied a position analogous to that which Sun Yat-sen did in the
Chinese. In other respects the new Kuomintang organization was remarkably
like the Communist. There was the extraordinarily complex, but somehow
effective, mechanism of a Party Congress, a Central Executive Committee,
and a Standing Committee. There was a Political Bureau and an agency for
overseas agitation. There were also the wide ramifications of an extensive
net work of auxiliary organizations designed to draw strength from every
popular enthusiasm, and deflect it to the cause of the Nationalist
revolution. In due time these agencies were turned about and swung into
action against the Communists who had attempted to master them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account