The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu ILinebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
History
The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu I
Linebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
Sun, Yat-sen, 1866-1925. San min zhu yi
the foreign powers refused to let his government at Canton exercise even
the limited authority permitted the Chinese by the treaties over their own
customs service, and did not let Sun take the surplus funds allowed the
Chinese (after payment of interest due on the money they had lent various
Chinese governments), his appreciation of the active propagation of
nationalism was heightened. He realized that the Chinese had to fight
their own battles, and that, while they might find individual friends
among the Westerners, they could scarcely hope for a policy of the great
powers which would actually foster the growth of the new national
China.(246) Simultaneously, he found his advocacy of a nationalist program
receiving unexpected support from the Soviet Union. His early contacts
with the Russians, who were the only foreigners actually willing to
intervene in his behalf with shipments of arms and money, made him
interested in the doctrines lying behind their actions, so inconsistent
with those of the other Western powers. In the Communist support of his
nationalism as a stage in the struggle against imperialism, he found his
third justification of a return, with full emphasis, to the program of
nationalism.
Hence, at the time that he delivered his sixteen lectures, which represent
the final and most authoritative stage of his principles, and the one with
which the present work is most concerned, he had returned to an advocacy
of nationalism after a temporary hope that enough work had been done along
that line. In expelling the alien Manchu rulers of China, he had hoped
that the old Chinese nationalism might revive, as soon as it was free of
the police restrictions had placed on race-national propaganda by the
Empire. He had found that this suspension of a nationalist campaign was
premature because nationalism had not firmly entrenched itself in the
Chinese social mind. In the first place, state allegiance was weak;
usurpers, dictators and military commandants strode about the Chinese
countryside with personal armies at their heels. Secondly, the foreign
powers, out of respect to whom, perhaps, a vigorous patriotic campaign had
not been carried out, did not show themselves anxious to assist China—at
least, not as anxious as Sun Yat-sen expected them to be. Third, the
inspiration offered by a power which, although temporarily submerged, had
recently been counted among the great powers of the world, and which had
rejected the aggressive policy which the rest of the Western nations, to a
greater or less degree, pursued in the Far East, was sufficient to
convince Sun Yat-sen of the justice of the doctrines of that power. Soviet
Russia did not stop with words; it offered to associate with China as an
equal, and the Soviet representative in Peking was the first diplomat to
be given the title of ambassador to China.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account