The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu ILinebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
History
The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu I
Linebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
Sun, Yat-sen, 1866-1925. San min zhu yi
43 Arthur Smith, one of the few Westerners to live in a Chinese village
for any length of years, wrote: “It is a noteworthy fact that the
government of China, while in theory more or less despotic, places
no practical restrictions upon the right of free assemblage by the
people for the consideration of their own affairs. The people of any
village can, if they choose, meet every day of the year. There is no
government censor present, and no restriction upon the liberty of
debate. The people can say what they like, and the local Magistrate
neither knows nor cares what is said.... But should insurrection
break out, these popular rights might be extinguished in a moment, a
fact of which all the people are perfectly well aware.” _Village
Life in China_, New York, 1899, p. 228. This was written thirteen
years before the fall of the Ch’ing dynasty.
44 J. S. Burgess, _The Guilds of Peking_, New York, 1928. This is
perhaps the best work on the subject of the guilds which has yet
appeared. The information was gathered by the students of the
author, who as a teacher had excellent facilities for developing
contacts. The students, as Chinese, were able to gather data from
the conservative guild leaders in a manner and to a degree that no
Westerner could have done. The classification here given is a
modification of Burgess’.
45 S. Wells Williams, _The Middle Kingdom_, New York, 1895, p. 405. Dr.
Williams, whose work is perhaps the most celebrated single work on
China in the English language, wrote as follows concerning the
nobility under the Ch’ing:
“The titular nobility of the Empire, as a whole, is a body whose
members are without power, land, wealth, office, or influence, in
virtue of their honors; some of them are more or less hereditary,
but the whole system has been so devised, and the designations so
conferred, as to tickle the vanity of those who receive them,
without granting them any real power. The titles are not derived
from landed estates, but the rank is simply designated in addition
to the name....” He also pointed out that, under the Ch’ing, the
only hereditary titles of any significance were _Yen Shing Kung_
(for the descendant of Confucius) and _Hai Ching Kung_ (for the
descendant of Kuo Hsing-hua, the formidable sea adventurer who drove
the Dutch out of Taiwan and made himself master of that island).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account