The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu ILinebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
History
The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu I
Linebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
Sun, Yat-sen, 1866-1925. San min zhu yi
52 In this connection, it might be pointed out that the attractive
strength of the two civilizations has not, as yet, been adequately
studied, although there is an enormous amount of loose
generalization on the subject: “The Chinese are becoming completely
Westernized,” or “The Chinese, in spite of their veneer, are always
Chinese; they will, in the end, absorb their conquerors.” But will
they? In the face of a modern educational and propaganda system,
there is at least room for doubt; it is not beyond all conjecture
that the Chinese of Manchuria might be Japanized as easily as the
fiercely chauvinistic Japanese might be sinicized. The only adequate
answer to the question would be through detailed studies of the
social conditioning and preferences of Chinese under foreign
influence (as in Hongkong, Taiwan, Manchuria), and of foreigners
under Chinese influence (the White Russians in China, the few other
Westerners in preëminently Chinese milieux).
53 An example of this is to be found in Manabendra Nath Roy,
_Revolution und Konterrevolution in China_, Berlin, 1930. Roy was
one of the emissaries of the Third International to the
Nationalists, and his ineptness in practical politics assisted
materially in the weakening of the Communist position. His work
quite seriously employs all the familiar clichés of Western class
dispute, and analyzes the Chinese situation in terms that ignore the
fact that China is Chinese.
54 This same line of attack seems, in the West, to be employed only by
the Catholic church which, while opposing any avowedly
collectivistic totalitarian state, seeks to maintain control on an
ideological and not a political basis, over almost all aspects of
the life of its members. No political party or governing group seems
to share this attitude.
55 Karl A. Wittfogel, in his _Sun Yat-sen_, cited, as well as Roy, in
the work cited, thinks very little of the justice of Confucianism.
The extreme mobility of Chinese society, which largely precluded the
development of any permanent class rule, is either unknown to them
or ignored. If the ideologue-officials of old China composed a
class, they were a class like no other known, for they provided for
the continuous purging of their own class, and its continuous
recruitment from all levels of society—excepting that of prostitutes
and soldiers.
56 T’ang Leang-li writes, in _The Inner History of the Chinese
Revolution_, New York, 1930, p. 168, as follows concerning Sun
Yat-sen’s early teaching of nationalism:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account