India -- History -- British occupation, 1765-1947; India -- Politics and government -- 1765-1947
(4) That the revolutionary movement received a substantial impetus by
the failure of constitutional agitation for the reversal of the policy
that decided on partitioning Bengal into two divisions. This failure led
to two different kinds of agitation, open and secret: (_a_) open
economic defiance by _Swadeshi_ and boycott--_Swadeshi_ was the
affirmative and boycott the negative form of the same movement.
_Swadeshi_ enjoined the use of country made articles; boycott was
directed against English imports, (_b_) open propaganda by a more
outspoken and in some instances violent press, (_c_) open control of
educational agencies by means of national institutions, (_d_) open
stimulus to physical education and physical culture, (_e_) nationalistic
interpretation of religious dogma and forms (open), (_f_) organization
of secret societies for more violent propaganda, for learning and
teaching the use of firearms, for the manufacture of bombs, for illicit
purchase and stealing of firearms, for assassination and murder, (_g_)
secret attempts to tamper with the army, (_h_) conspiracies for
terroristic purposes and for obtaining sinews of war by theft, robbery
and extortion.
The following two extracts which the committee has taken from one of the
publications of the revolutionary party called _Mukti Kon Pathe_ (what
is the path of salvation) will explain clauses (_f_) and (_g_) and
(_h_).
"The book further points out that not much muscle was required to
shoot Europeans, that arms could be procured by grim
determination, and that weapons could be prepared silently in
some secret place. Indians could be sent to foreign countries to
learn the art of making weapons. The assistance of Indian soldiers
must be obtained. They must be made to understand the misery and
wretchedness of the country. The heroism of Sivaji must be
remembered. As long as revolutionary work remained in its infancy,
expenses could be met by subscriptions. But as work advanced,
money must be extracted from society by the application of force.
If the revolution is being brought about for the welfare of
society, then it is perfectly just to collect money from society
for that purpose. It is admitted that theft and dacoity are crimes
because they violate the principle of good society. But the
political dacoit is aiming at the good of society, "so no sin but
rather virtue attaches to the destruction of this small good for
the sake of some higher good. Therefore if revolutionaries extort
money from the miserly or luxurious members of society by the
application of force, their conduct is perfectly just."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account