India -- History -- British occupation, 1765-1947; India -- Politics and government -- 1765-1947
that the ministers' salaries, instead of any longer being treated
as a reserved subject, and, therefore, protected in the last
resort by the Governor's order from interference should be
specifically voted each year by the legislative council; or,
failing such direction by the Government of India, it should be
open to the councils at that time or subsequently to demand by
resolution that such ministers' salaries should be so voted, and
the Government of India should thereupon give effect to such
request."
_Periodic commissions_: ... Ten years after the first meeting of
the new councils established under the Statute a commission should
be appointed to review the position. Criticism has been expressed
in the past of the composition of Royal Commissions, and it is our
intention that the commission which we suggest should be regarded
as authoritative and should derive its authority from Parliament
itself. The names of the commissioners, therefore, should be
submitted by the Secretary of State to both Houses of Parliament
for approval by resolution. The commissioners' mandate should be
to consider whether by the end of the term of the legislature then
in existence it would be possible to establish complete
responsible government in any province or provinces, or how far it
would be possible to approximate it in others; to advise on the
continued reservation of any departments for the transfer of which
to popular control it has been proved to their satisfaction that
the time had not yet come; to recommend the retransfer of other
matters to the control of the Governor in Council if serious
maladministration were established; and to make any
recommendations for the working of responsible government or the
improvement of the constitutional machinery which experience of
the systems in operation may show to be desirable....
"There are several other important matters, germane in greater or
less degree to our main purpose, which the commission should
review. They should investigate the progress made in admitting
Indians into the higher ranks of the public service. They should
examine the apportionment of the financial burden of India with a
view to adjusting it more fairly between the provinces. The
commission should also examine the development of education among
the people and the progress and working of local self-governing
bodies. Lastly the commission should consider the working of the
franchise and the constitution of electorates, including the
important matter of the retention of communal representation.
Indeed, we regard the development of a broad franchise as the arch
on which the edifice of self-government must be raised; for we
have no intention that our reforms should result merely in the
transfer of powers from a bureaucracy to an oligarchy...."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account