The Political History of England - Vol XI: From Addington's Administration to the close of William IV.'s Reign (1801-1837)Brodrick, George C. (George Charles)
History
The Political History of England - Vol XI: From Addington's Administration to the close of William IV.'s Reign (1801-1837)
Brodrick, George C. (George Charles)
Great Britain -- History -- 1800-1837; Great Britain -- Politics and government -- 1800-1837
misery which darkened the close of George III.'s reign.
FOOTNOTES:
[68] Lord Londonderry in Twiss, _Life of Eldon_, ii., 432.
[69] Harriet Martineau, _History of England During the Thirty Years'
Peace_, i., 274.
[70] _Letters to Copleston_, p. 295.
[71] Cunningham, _Growth of English Industry and Commerce in Modern
Times_ (edit. 1903), pp. 756-59. Compare Dicey, _Law and Opinion in
England_, pp. 190-200.
[72] The graphic description of this crisis in Harriet Martineau's
_History of the Thirty Years' Peace_, i., 355-66, deserves to be studied
and remembered as a masterpiece of social portraiture by a contemporary.
[73] Cunningham, _Growth of English Industry and Commerce in Modern
Times_, p. 823.
[74] Walpole's _History of England_, vol. ii., p. 187.
CHAPTER X.
PROBLEMS IN SOUTHERN EUROPE.
The events of the year 1820 subjected the European concert to a severe
strain. An insurrection broke out in Spain on January 1, and on March 9
the king was forced to swear fidelity to the obsolete constitution of
1812. The result was to plunge the country into disorder, as both the
clerical party and the extreme revolutionists refused to accept the
constitution. Meanwhile the assassination by a working man of the Duke
of Berry, who died on February 14, 1820, had occasioned a new royalist
reaction in France, and had increased the general fear of the
revolutionary party. The Bourbon succession had seemed to depend on his
life, for his son, the Count of Chambord, was posthumous. On receiving
the news of the Spanish revolution the tsar, already tiring of his
liberal enthusiasm, fell back on his scheme for exercising paternal
discipline over Europe. He proposed in April that the ambassadors at
Paris should issue a joint remonstrance requiring the Spanish cortes to
disavow the revolution, and to enact severe laws against sedition.
Failing this, he proposed joint intervention, and offered for his own
part to send an army of 15,000 men through North Italy and southern
France to co-operate in the suppression of the revolution. To this
Castlereagh replied that England would never consent to a joint
intervention in Spain. Metternich was too much displeased with the
Russian encouragement of secret societies in Italy to wish to see
Russian troops in that country, and both Castlereagh and Metternich
wished to keep Spain free from French influence. In the face of this
opposition Russia could not, and France would not, do anything, and all
thought of intervention was postponed. It was the last time that
Castlereagh was able to assert the principle of non-intervention
without breaking up the European concert.
[Pageheading: _REVOLUTIONS IN SOUTHERN EUROPE._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account