The Political Institutions of the Ancient GreeksHammond, Basil Edward
History
The Political Institutions of the Ancient Greeks
Hammond, Basil Edward
Greece -- Politics and government; Political science
The small size of the Greek cities and their incapacity for acting in
concert led to their subjugation by Macedonia in 338 B.C. About sixty
or eighty years later many of them had recovered their independence,
and some of them, in order to guard against a second conquest by
Macedonia, joined together in a league or federation. The union of
many communities in a federation was not a new thing in Greek history:
during several centuries that preceded the year 338 B.C. some obscure
tribes of mountaineers (the Achæans) had lived in such a union; their
league had been broken up by the Macedonian conquerors, but they had
been able, about 281 B.C., to reconstitute it: and the Greek cities,
when they began, about 251 B.C., to see their need of mutual defence,
had the Achæan League ready at hand, and were able to gain what they
needed by enrolling themselves among its members. The Achæan League,
enlarged by the admission of many important cities, was a federal
state: that is to say, it was a community in which each city or canton
had a government of its own for most purposes, but the federation or
union of cities and cantons had also a common government for those
matters which most nearly concerned the safety of them all. The League
was perfectly successful till 221 B.C. in attaining the ends for which
it had been established, and is remarkable as furnishing the first
example in history of a well organized federal state[8].
[8] For details see Chapter VII.
The Romans employed the strength, which they had acquired through their
conquest of Italy and their success in the second Punic war, in getting
possession of many distant territories inhabited by alien races. Before
146 B.C. they were masters of Macedonia, part of Asia Minor, Spain and
northern Africa, and the Roman dominions presented an example of a
mere political aggregate, or heterogeneous empire or number of peoples
having no natural attraction for one another and held together only by
force. For the rule of a heterogeneous empire the institutions of a
city and even of an expanded city proved utterly unsuitable: and it was
necessary that both the conquering city and the dominions which it had
conquered should submit to be ruled under a centralised and despotic
system of government adapted to the needs of a heterogeneous empire.
The right system was only gradually made, but it had been completed by
the death of the Emperor Constantine the Great in 337 A.D.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account