The Political Institutions of the Ancient GreeksHammond, Basil Edward
History
The Political Institutions of the Ancient Greeks
Hammond, Basil Edward
Greece -- Politics and government; Political science
During the five centuries which followed the Moorish conquest of
Spain the Goths who lived on the shores of the Bay of Biscay and the
inhabitants of the southern valleys of the Pyrenees gradually expanded
by reconquering territory from the Moors, and before the middle of
the twelfth century had formed the two large political communities of
Castile and Arragon[11]. Each of these communities during its long
contest with the Moors had acquired habits, thoughts and institutions
of its own, and they were but little inclined to join themselves
together into a single nation. The marriage of Ferdinand of Arragon
with Isabella of Castile in 1469 produced as its result some time later
that both Castile and Arragon were ruled by the same government: but
differences and jealousies between the two peoples continued to exist
long afterwards, even so late as the War of the Spanish Succession in
the eighteenth century[12], and it may well be doubted whether the two
were ever welded together into a single Spanish nation until after the
terrible misfortunes which they endured and the great efforts which
they made in a common cause during their war against Napoleon.
[11] Hallam, _Middle Ages_, Chapter IV.
[12] Stanhope, _Reign of Queen Anne_, Vol. I. p. 264.
In Gaul the formation of a large political community was delayed till
late in the middle ages; in Germany, the original home of the Germans,
no large political community of great importance was established till
late in the seventeenth century. In both countries the same hindrances
stood in the way of the making of great communities. The two countries
were included in the heterogeneous empires founded between 687 A.D. and
800 A.D. by the house of Pepin, especially by Charlemagne, the greatest
man of the house of Pepin: in that empire, as in all heterogeneous
empires, it was found necessary that the central ruler should delegate
very great powers to the officials who governed provinces or districts:
and under the circumstances of the time it was also found convenient
for him to grant large estates of land to men who had been useful to
him and could be trusted to serve him well in the future. In 843 Gaul
(or the land of the West Franks) was severed from the empire, and
set up a king of its own, who pretended to have the same powers as
Charlemagne had exercised. But the kings of the West Franks could not
control the local officials and landowners: by the eleventh century
the local officials and the landowners had converted themselves into
independent sovereigns, each ruling his own lands and the men who
lived on his lands: that particular landowner who still enjoyed the
title of king had no authority (or at any rate no authority which he
could habitually exercise) except within the lands which specially
belonged to him: and even within his own lands he, like the other
landowners in Gaul, found that his authority was often disputed in arms
by his tenants.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account