The Political Institutions of the Ancient Greeks — John Shaqi
The Political Institutions of the Ancient GreeksHammond, Basil Edward
History
The Political Institutions of the Ancient Greeks
Hammond, Basil Edward
Greece -- Politics and government; Political science
The most important of these propositions are those which assert that
there is an intimate connexion between the form of a political body
and the form of government by which it is ruled: and that each of the
forms that a political body can assume has a certain type or certain
types of government commonly and almost uniformly associated with it.
The propositions may be set down in the following way. Firstly, all
the tribes of which we have any good records have had governments not
differing from one another in any important particular. Secondly,
cities pure and simple or inexpansive cities have usually three kinds
of government only, pure oligarchy, or pure despotism, or direct and
almost unmixed democracy: and Republican Rome, the single example
of an expanded city, had a government peculiar to itself. Thirdly,
in the large unitary states or nations, it is, roughly speaking,
true that three kinds of government have succeeded one another in
regular sequence: at first, during the middle ages, they were under
governments in which power belonged partly to a king and partly to an
assembly of estates, the assembly consisting usually of the nobles,
the prelates of the church, and representatives from rural districts
and towns: afterwards, when they were in danger of disruption, they
placed themselves under monarchies of unlimited or almost unlimited
power, and these monarchies usually continued to exist after all
danger of disruption had been removed: and now, in modern times, all
unitary states are ruled by cabinets under the control or supervision
of popular representative assemblies. Turning to federal states,
which form the fourth class of political communities, we find that
all of them are alike in having a central government both legislative
and executive, whose sphere of action is strictly limited by the
constitution to certain portions of the work of governing, and in
permitting each of the states, which are joined together in the
federation, also to have a government of its own, which controls all
business except that portion which is allotted by the constitution to
the central government of the federation. And, lastly, heterogeneous
empires must, unless they are to break in pieces, have governments
whose chief object is centralisation. Supreme power may belong to a
despotic monarch or to a small body of men appointed by a foreign
state which rules the empire: but in all cases the one thing necessary
is that there shall be a central supreme power and that the commands of
that supreme power shall be implicitly obeyed by everyone within the
empire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account