The Political Institutions of the Ancient Greeks — John Shaqi
The Political Institutions of the Ancient GreeksHammond, Basil Edward
History
The Political Institutions of the Ancient Greeks
Hammond, Basil Edward
Greece -- Politics and government; Political science
[104] The ambassadors sent by the Athenians in their extreme distress
during the occupation of Athens by Mardonius were received by the
Ephors and were kept waiting ten days for an answer. Herodotus IX.
7-11.
[105] For example in 432 B.C. Thucydides I. 85-87.
The kings in time of peace were dignitaries without power: at
sacrificial feasts and athletic contests they took the seats of honour
and after a sacrifice the skins of the victims were their perquisite:
the state provided them with regular monthly allowances of food: they
superintended religious matters, and settled what Spartan citizens
should be the πρόξενοι or befrienders of visitors to Sparta from
the various Greek states: and they had jurisdiction about marriages
of heiresses, public ways, and adoption of children: but with these
exceptions all control of home affairs had passed from the kings to the
Ephors[106]. In time of war the kings were commanders of the Spartan
armies, and the history of Agesilaus shows that in this capacity they
might gain high distinction and influence: but the expeditions of the
Spartans were usually accompanied by some of the Ephors[107], who could
afterwards report to their colleagues any action of the commander which
displeased them.
[106] For the powers of the kings in time of peace see Herodotus VI.
57.
[107] [Xenophon] _De Rep. Lac._ 13. § 5.
Until the beginning of the Peloponnesian war in 432 B.C., it seems that
the government, whether it was controlled by the kings, the council,
or the Ephors, was faithfully conducted for the interests of the
whole of the little community of the Spartiatæ. We do not hear of the
rulers living in luxury, nor of inequalities or discontents among the
Spartiatæ, nor of emancipations of Helots. Twice only in the course
of several centuries we read that the Spartans made a new law[108]:
in foreign policy they were unenterprising: and they seem to have
devoted themselves to the cultivation of the military virtues enjoined
by their traditions, and to looking after their interests at home,
which consisted largely in keeping down, degrading and humiliating the
Messenians and the other Helots.
[108] Smith, _Dict. Ant._, third edition, vol. I. p. 915.
IV. While the Spartans were waging their great war against the
Athenians (432-404 B.C.) and afterwards when they were enjoying the
advantages which their success procured for them, many alterations
were gradually introduced in their customs and government. Helots
were emancipated for service as soldiers: inequalities arose among
the Spartiatæ, some of them acquiring great fortunes as regulators
(harmosts) in foreign cities, others sinking to poverty and losing
their civic rights: and the Ephors used their time of office for the
getting of wealth and enjoyment of luxury.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account