Fiction -- History and criticism; Political fiction -- History and criticism; Politics in literature
The Duchess of Omnium’s discourse upon the tasks Omnium is unwilling to
perform is much more an indictment of politics in its worst sense than
this comparatively restrained analysis of Trollope’s. In much the same
vein Meredith’s Stukely Culbrett declares that Nevil Beauchamp has “too
strong a dose of fool’s honesty to succeed....” Hamer Shawcross’s own
distillate of thirty years of political experience is a bitter brew.
Dissimulation is the chief element in the formula for success. The
politician must be an adept psychologist appealing not to reason and
intellect but to “panic, passion, and prejudice.” Shawcross cynically
adds that if these factors are not present at the critical moment, the
politician must know how to create them. The lesson one learns from
Chester Nimmo’s career is that the successful office holder must be as
agile as a gymnast, as flexible as a contortionist, and as vigilant as
a radar screen. In certain instances, the politician owes success to
what he does not do rather than to what he does. The ultimate in the
ossification of faculties whose exercise may be dangerous is reached by
the Communists. General Golz reveals his formula for survival to Robert
Jordan: “I never think at all. Why should I? I am General Sovietique. I
never think. Do not try to trap me into thinking.”
Peter Stirling’s list of requirements for political success is quite
different. Although he mentions physical superiority and dishonesty,
his lecture sounds like a naïve version of the Boy Scout oath.
He mentions bosses, but his account of the way he influences his
constituents suggests Socratic dialogues in Athenian meadows rather
than politics in a tenement district of downtown Manhattan. The
physical characteristics which he mentions briefly are noted by other
authors, however. Nick Burr is a Virginia Lincoln in appearance, while
Senator Ratcliffe in _Democracy_, and Senator Planefield in _Through
One Administration_, represent the portly and impressive type. Dan
Lurcock’s acquisition of Willis Markham is based upon precisely these
qualities: “Let him get that magnificent head into the legislature,
where it would be on view, and there was nothing he might not do
with it.” This case appears to exaggerate the value of physical
impressiveness, but it illustrates the very real advantage which it
confers upon its possessor.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account