Detective and mystery stories; Murder -- Investigation -- Fiction; Police -- England -- Fiction
‘But,’ explained Mr Arbuthnot, ‘you must not think from this Austin is
a man of bad or weak character. The separation was due purely to
incompatibility of temperament. Austin, so far as I know, is an
honourable, kindly man, and I have never heard of him doing a shady
thing. He is a hard worker too, and I believe has carried out some
quite valuable original research into the distribution of disease by
insects. Sir William recognised this, hence the allowance, and the
fact that, though they couldn’t pull together, they never really
quarreled.’
‘I rather gathered that from the way the servants spoke,’ Tanner
answered. ‘But there is another Ponson you haven’t
mentioned—Cosgrove.’
‘Cosgrove is the only child of Sir William’s brother John,
consequently he and Austin are first cousins. Cosgrove is the least
estimable member of the family. He was, I am afraid, a bit of a waster
from the first. He did badly at school, and was all but sent down from
college. His father kept some kind of control over him during his
life, but on his death he inherited a large sum of money, and I fear
it had the usual result. He now lives in bachelor quarters in
Knightsbridge, and is reported to be in a rather fast set. I happen to
know he has run through most of his money, and is now considerably
pinched. But he always got on well with Sir William. The old man liked
him, and passed over his follies as mere youthful indiscretions. I
think his disappointment in Austin rather drove him to make a friend
of Cosgrove, but of that of course I can’t be sure. He left Cosgrove a
good slice of his fortune at all events.’
‘That was the next thing, Mr Arbuthnot, I wished to ask you—about the
financial position of the various members of the family.’
‘Obviously, I can give you only very approximate figures. When the
death duties are paid I fancy Sir William’s capital will be worth
about £500,000 to his legatees. He has been up to the present allowing
Austin £1000 a year, and Miss Ponson and Cosgrove £500 each. His will
preserves the same proportion between them—Austin gets £150,000, and
Miss Ponson and Cosgrove £75,000 each, the remainder, about £200,000,
going to Lady Ponson.’
‘Suppose any of these four should die intestate?’
‘If that question should arise the deceased’s share is to be divided
between the survivors in the same proportions as was Sir William’s
money. It is a little complicated, but it would mean for example that
if Austin were to die without leaving a will, Lady Ponson would get
about £90,000 and Cosgrove and Enid £30,000 each of Austin’s
£150,000.’
‘Has Austin any means other than this £1000 a year?’
‘Not very much, I fancy. He has written a good deal on social and
scientific subjects, which must bring him in something, and he had a
legacy of £5000 from his Uncle John. But I don’t suppose he has more
than twelve or thirteen hundred a year.’
‘And Cosgrove? You do not know exactly how he is fixed financially?’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account