The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles IIPollock, John
History
The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles II
Pollock, John
Popish Plot, 1678
And hence arose the perplexity and depression of mind from which he
is said to have suffered during the last days of his life. He was
possessed of information which, if published, would infallibly ruin
the cause of the Duke of York and of the Catholics, to whom he was
friendly. It had come to him in private from his friend, and to use
it might seem an act almost of treachery. Yet with these sentiments
Godfrey’s duty as a magistrate was in absolute conflict. It was
undoubtedly his business at once to communicate his knowledge to the
government. Not only was it illegal not to do so, and highly important
that such a weighty fact should not escape detection, but Godfrey
found himself at the centre of the investigation of Oates’ discovery,
and to reveal his news was probably the only way of exposing Oates’
perjury. Nor did Godfrey underestimate the danger into which this
knowledge brought him. He feared that he would be assassinated. The
Jesuits were confronted with the fact that a secret of unbounded value
to their enemies had come into the hands of just one of the men who
could not afford, however much he might wish, to retain it. Godfrey
was, by virtue of his position as justice of the peace, a government
official. He might take time to approach the point of revealing his
information, but sooner or later he would assuredly reveal it. All the
tremendous consequences which would ensue could not then be prevented
or palliated. The only possible remedy was to take from Godfrey the
power of divulging the secret. His silence must be secured, and it
could only be made certain by the grave. To the suggestion that the
motive to the crime was not sufficient, it need only be answered that
at least nine men preferred to die a horrible and ignominious death
rather than prove their innocence and purchase life by telling the
facts.[281] Godfrey’s death was no ludicrous act of stupid revenge, but
a clear-headed piece of business. It was a move in the game which was
played in England between parties and religions, and which dealt with
issues graver than those of life and death.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account