The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles IIPollock, John
History
The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles II
Pollock, John
Popish Plot, 1678
So far the matter is clear. Sir Edmund Godfrey was an intolerable
obstacle to the Jesuit party. He was in possession of a secret the
disclosure of which would utterly ruin them. He recognised himself that
his life was in danger and went in expectation of being assassinated.
His murder was, like Charles the First’s execution, a cruel necessity.
Two men gave evidence as to his death. The one, Bedloe, contradicted
himself beyond belief. Nevertheless he was able to recognise and accuse
the other, Prance, whose minute and consistent descriptions of time
and place mark him as a partner in the crime. The inference therefore
is sound that, as Bedloe accused correctly a man whom he knew by sight
and not by name, some of the men whose names he gave directly in his
account of the murder were probably the real criminals. These were
Le Fevre, the Jesuit confessor of the queen, Charles Walsh, a Jesuit
attached to the household of Lord Bellasis, and Charles Pritchard, a
third member of the Society of Jesus. With them were associated the
Roman Catholic silversmith, Miles Prance, whom Bedloe recognised as
the man whom he had taken for a waiter in the queen’s chapel, and
a servant of Lord Bellasis, whom he named as Mr. Robert Dent.[282]
Strictly, it is only a matter of conjecture that these men undertook
the deed, but it is supported by considerable probability. They were
singularly unfitted for the task. Godfrey had to be killed and his
corpse to be disposed in such a way that the crime might not be traced
to its true source. The men to do this were not professional criminals.
They did not know, what constant experience has demonstrated, that
the most apparently simple crimes are the hardest to bring home to
their authors. Their proper course was to waylay the magistrate in
the darkness of a narrow street, strip his body of every article of
value, and leave it to be supposed that the murder had been committed
for a vulgar robbery. Instead of this they determined to dispose the
corpse in such a way that Godfrey might be thought to have committed
suicide. The disposal would need time, and to gain the time necessary
it was needful that they should choose a spot to which they could have
free access, and where they would be undisturbed. As the most secret
spot known to them they chose exactly that which they should have most
avoided, the queen’s palace, Somerset House. To decoy Godfrey was not
difficult, for, contrary to the practice of the day, he went abroad
habitually without a servant.[283] The court of Somerset House was
not, as the Duke of York afterwards declared in his memoirs, crowded
with people; on the contrary, it was understood that the queen was
private, and orders were given that visitors were not to be admitted
in their coaches.[284] The queen’s confessor and his friends however
could doubtless secure an entrance. Here Godfrey was murdered, and in
Somerset House his body remained for four nights. In what place it
was kept cannot be decided.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account