The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles IIPollock, John
History
The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles II
Pollock, John
Popish Plot, 1678
In no part of the country was persecution more bitter than in
Yorkshire. Even before the time of the Popish Plot Catholics in the
country had been subjected to considerable annoyance, and when “the
great crack and noise” of the event burst on the astonished ears
of the world they became at once the object of vehement attack.
Inquisition was made in all parts for priests and recusants. The
cells of York Castle, of which the condition was notorious in an age
of notorious prisons, were filled. To priests and their relatives
particular attention was paid. Soon two scoundrels, by name Mowbray
and Bolron, came forward to give evidence of the preparations of
papists to aid in the grand design discovered by Oates. Bolron had
been manager of coal-pits on the estate of Sir Thomas Gascoigne, an
aged baronet and representative of the ancient family of Barnbow Hall
in the West Riding, and, being suspected of fraud, was threatened with
a prosecution for felony by Lady Tempest, the baronet’s daughter.
Mowbray was a servant in the same family discharged on suspicion of
theft. Thus the two had every reason to plot revenge. Bolron swore that
Sir Thomas, together with his daughter, Sir Miles Stapleton, several
other gentlemen, and his nephew, a priest named Thwing, had signed
a resolution to kill the king and had offered a thousand pounds to
whoever should do the deed. Mowbray added that they had intended to
burn London and York to the ground. The Yorkshire magistrates refused
to act on the information of known criminals, but Bolron went to town
and found in Shaftesbury an inquisitor who would not consent to see the
matter dropped.[354] Sir Thomas was tried at Westminster, but acquitted
by a jury of Yorkshire gentlemen. Sir Miles Stapleton and Lady Tempest
stood their trial at York. They also were acquitted, but upon the
same discreditable evidence Thwing was convicted and on October 23,
1680 suffered the penalty for high treason. In spite of the fact that
three juries had disbelieved his word Bolron was able by permission of
the House of Commons to produce an ingenious forgery, entitled “The
Papists’ Bloody Oath of Secrecy and Litany of Intercession,” which
after repeated exposure and the lapse of more than two centuries is
still sometimes taken for true by his more gullible, if less malignant,
successors. For the moment the acquittal of Gascoigne and his friends
stayed the flow of blood, but the Yorkshire Protestants shewed
effectively by their conduct at the Revolution that their feelings
remained unchanged.[355]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account