The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles IIPollock, John
History
The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles II
Pollock, John
Popish Plot, 1678
The ignorance which was thus displayed of the proper nature of
testimony has constantly been considered as a mark of atrocious
ferocity and cowardly time-service in the judges of the period. Such a
view is entirely erroneous. The evidence accepted at political trials
did not differ in character from that acted upon at trials the causes
of which were remote from politics. Fortunately there are means by
which this can be proved exactly. It is fortunate, for it is improbable
that the same type of perjured evidence should appear in any other than
a political trial. Of perjured evidence there was no doubt plenty at
every assize, as is witnessed by the case of the Rev. Mr. Hawkins,[579]
where a considerable dose was nearly swallowed without being detected.
But in this style of lie there was not the same boldness, the same
play of fancy, the same overriding of the limits of likelihood which
has rendered the acceptance of Oates’ evidence unintelligible to
historians except on the supposition of monstrous immorality in the
judges and juries. “Witnesses,” writes Fox, “of such a character as not
to deserve credit in the most trifling cause, upon the most immaterial
facts, gave evidence so incredible, or, to speak more properly, so
impossible to be true, that it ought not to have been believed if it
had come from the mouth of Cato; and upon such evidence, from such
witnesses, were innocent men condemned to death and executed.”[580]
Such a state of things, thought Fox and many after him, is not to
be explained on any supposition other than that of wilfully wicked
blindness to the truth, and can hardly be paralleled in modern history.
There is however, if not a parallel, at least a very great similarity
between the evidence offered at the trials for the Popish Plot and that
taken at another series of trials of almost the same date, to find
which no one need go further than a different page in the same volume
of reports. The same tangled farrago of wild nonsense with which Oates
and his fellow-witnesses filled the courts is, on another plane, almost
exactly reproduced in the witch trials of the seventeenth century.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account