The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles IIPollock, John
History
The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles II
Pollock, John
Popish Plot, 1678
The evidence called to support and to oppose this was very
contradictory. It was sworn that, talking about the affray at a tavern
next day, Giles said, “God damn him, God rot him, he had armour on”;
but the witness admitted that he might have said, “God rot him, he had
armour on, they say.”[776] The prisoner declared that he merely told it
as a common piece of news that Arnold would have been killed had he not
worn armour, and called a witness who affirmed that this was so, that
Giles had called the attempt “a cruel assassination” of which he was
sorry to hear, and had made use of no oaths at all.[777] Evidence was
given for the crown that Giles had hurried through Usk on May 5, saying
that he was afraid of being arrested for the assault on Arnold, and at
a cutler’s shop where he went to have a sword mended said he had been
fighting “with damned Arnold.”[778] This was contradicted by the Mayor
of Monmouth, who proved that Giles had not hurried through Usk, but
stayed there several hours; and by the cutler’s apprentice, who proved
that when the prisoner was asked, “How came your sword broke? Have you
been fighting with the devil?” so far from speaking the words alleged,
he had answered, “No, for I never met with Arnold.”[779] A great deal
of evidence was given concerning the prisoner’s movements on the night
of April 15. He had passed the evening in company at various taverns,
and had finally gone to sleep at the King’s Arms in St. Martin’s Lane;
but as the witnesses arrived at the times o’clock to which they deposed
by guess-work alone, their evidence was naturally contradictory; and it
seems now quite impossible to know certainly whether Giles was, as the
prosecution contended, seen last at ten o’clock and did not go to bed
till one in the morning, or, as the witnesses for the defence stated,
had been in company till the hour of eleven or twelve.[780] According
to the evidence therefore, which Jeffreys summed up at length and with
moderation,[781] it was open to the jury to find either for or against
the prisoner, and after deliberating for half an hour they returned a
verdict of guilty. Giles was sentenced to the fine of £500 and to be
pilloried three times. On July 26 he was pilloried in Lincoln’s Inn
Fields and was pelted so severely that his life was in danger; and
when the remainder of the sentence was carried out in Holborn and the
Strand, he had to be protected from the mob by a guard of constables
and watchmen.[782]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account