The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles II — John Shaqi
The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles IIPollock, John
History
The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles II
Pollock, John
Popish Plot, 1678
Although Coleman wrote to the nuncio that the Catholics had never
before had so favourable an opportunity, the design was shortly
modified and deferred.[68] In its present shape the possibility of
putting it to the test depended upon the good-will of the ministers.
After the dissolution of Parliament their assistance would be
necessary. Without it nothing could be done. If Parliament were
dissolved and the ministers stopped the execution of all that was
to follow, the last state would be worse than the first. And it now
became evident that matters were in just that case. Whatever the Cabal
might have done, it was certain that those who followed would have no
hand in exalting the Duke of York’s power. Danby, whose watchword was
Monarchy and No Toleration, was now firmly fixed in authority. Early
in February a proclamation was issued ordering the execution of the
penal laws, whetted against Roman Catholics by the promise of reward
to informers; young men were to be recalled from Catholic seminaries
abroad, subjects were forbidden to hear mass in the chapels of foreign
ambassadors, all English priests were banished from the kingdom.[69]
The effect of the proclamation was chiefly moral; but the worst
consequences might be expected from the Non-Resistance bill, now in
active preparation for the April session. Should this be passed,
Catholic, Presbyterian, and Whig alike would be excluded from all part
in the management of affairs, and the royal Church of England would
triumph. The Duke of York’s party veered round and adopted the cause
of parliament as a bulwark for themselves against the ministerial
attack. The moment was critical for all concerned. A golden age seemed
to have arrived for the Commons. Money was showered lavishly on them.
Fortune rained every coinage in Europe. Danby, the Bishops, the Dutch,
and the Spanish ambassador did battle with their rouleaux against the
Catholics, the Nonconformists, the French ambassador and theirs. The
scenes in Parliament were unprecedented, and have since scarcely been
surpassed. Swords were drawn and members spat across the floor of
the House. In the House of Lords the king appeared regularly at the
debates to exert a personal influence on his peers, and was likened
to the sun, scorching his opponents. Here Charles and Danby had the
advantage, and after seventeen days the bill was sent down to the
Commons; but Shaftesbury, who had fought with the utmost resolution,
seized his opportunity to foment the old dispute between the Houses as
to the right of appeal to the Lords, with such success that the session
had to be closed before the bill could be introduced, Parliament was
prorogued, and the Test vanished for ever.[70] Coleman and his friends
breathed again and proceeded to adapt their programme to the new
situation. Since dissolution would not help them, they would mould
Parliament to their design. At the moment the Duke of York’s position
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account