The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles IIPollock, John
History
The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles II
Pollock, John
Popish Plot, 1678
Oates’ credit was rudely shaken. Nevertheless the matter could not be
dropped without further investigation. The informer managed to cover
his mistakes by the suggestion that he had himself been deceived. He
had misspelt the name of Louis XIV’s confessor, calling him Le Shee;
but in an age of loose spelling, when Barillon wrote of Shaftesbury
as Schasberi, and Cardinal Howard’s name was spelt Huart by a papal
nuncio, this was not of great weight. Oates had evidently lied, but
perhaps he had spoken some truth. His assurance and readiness had
been such as to amaze the council. Charles himself was taken aback,
and though he gave no credence to the informer’s story, felt that
great care was necessary for the discovery of the truth. Falsehood
has not been unknown in the seventeenth and other centuries as a prop
to even a good cause. At all events persons, against whom serious
charges, not disproved, had been made, could not be allowed to remain
at large. So on the second night in succession Oates was sent his
rounds with a guard, sleepless and defying the stormy weather. Before
dawn most of the Jesuits of eminence in London lay in gaol. At one
point the party encountered a check. Oates led his men to arrest
Whitebread, the provincial, at the residence of the Spanish ambassador.
The ambassador’s servants resisted the intrusion, and the next day
Count Egmont and the Marquis Bourgemayne lodged a complaint with the
secretary of state. Material compensation was not to be had, but an
ample apology; and the soldiers with Oates were said to have been
drunk and were punished.[132] Of greater importance than persons was a
find of papers. A warrant had been signed at the council board for the
arrest of Coleman. When the meeting rose the Earl of Danby noticed that
direction for seizing his papers had been omitted. He hastily caused
another warrant for this purpose to be drawn, and obtained the five
requisite signatures just in time that a messenger might be dispatched
the same evening. Coleman’s house was searched, and, besides others, a
deal box containing the most important of his letters was found in a
secret recess behind a chimney. Danby could boast with justice, when
he was accused of having acted in the French and papist interest, that
but for his action the chief evidence of the schemes of both in England
might never have come to hand. The Duke of York, against whom they
told heavily, would never forgive him, he said. Coleman surrendered
himself on Monday morning, and was put under the charge of a messenger
with only Oates’ accusation against him. He managed to send word to
the French ambassador that nothing would be found in his papers to
embarrass him. A cruel awakening from the dream was not long delayed.
When his letters came to be read, the lords of the council looked grave
and signed a warrant for his commitment. Coleman disappeared into
Newgate.[133]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account