The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles IIPollock, John
History
The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles II
Pollock, John
Popish Plot, 1678
Scarcely ever has a fact so problematical been attended by such weighty
results. Sir Edmund Godfrey left his house on October 12, 1678. On
October 17 his corpse was found in the fields at the foot of Primrose
Hill. From that moment belief in the Popish Plot was rooted in the
mind of the nation. The excitement throughout the country rose to the
mark of frenzy. Godfrey’s death seemed clear evidence of the truth
of Oates’ sanguinary tales, and the prelude to a general massacre of
Protestants. It became an article of faith that he had been murdered
by the Catholics. To deny it was to incur the most awkward suspicion.
No man thought himself safe from the same fate. Every householder laid
in a stock of arms. Posts and chains barricaded the streets of the
city. Night after night the Trained Bands stood to arms and paraded
the town as if an insurrection were expected before morning. During
the winter which followed, wrote Shaftesbury, “the soberest and most
peaceable of the people have, either in town or country, hardly slept
for fear of fire or massacring by the Papists.” Alderman Sir Thomas
Player declared that when he went to bed “he did not know but the next
morning they might all rise with their throats cut.” And this state
of things continued, as sober Calamy remarked, “not for a few weeks
or months only, but for a great while together.” It was regarded as
most fortunate that the Protestants did not seek to avenge Godfrey and
anticipate their own doom by exterminating the Roman Catholics.[136]
Upon the death of a London magistrate was grounded the firm conviction
of the reality of the Popish Plot, under cover of which the Whig party
was all but successful in deranging the legitimate succession to the
throne, and even perhaps in overturning the monarchy itself. Of the
instruments by which Shaftesbury turned the Plot to this end, none was
more powerful than the belief in Godfrey’s murder. In one connection
or another that event appeared in almost all the state trials of the
two following years, in the debates in Parliament, in the pulpit, on
the stage.[137] The part which it played in the electioneering methods
of the Whigs was still more formidable, and Godfrey’s corpse was a
central figure in the grand annual ceremonies of Pope Burning, which
were arranged by the Green Ribbon Club.[138] Without the mystery of
Godfrey’s death it is possible that the agitation of the plot would
have burnt itself out in the course of a few months. As it was, the
fuel was fanned into a blaze of unexampled fierceness, which did not
die down until nearly three momentous years in English history had
passed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account