The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles IIPollock, John
History
The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles II
Pollock, John
Popish Plot, 1678
proved that when his master went out on the morning of October 12 “he
had then a laced band about his neck.” When the body was found, this
had disappeared. Presumably it was with this that the act had been
accomplished.
That the murder was not for vulgar ends of robbery was proved by the
valuables found upon the body. Another fact of importance which came
to light at the inquest shewed as clearly that it was dictated by some
deeper motive. The lanes leading to the fields surrounding Primrose
Hill were deep and miry. If Godfrey had walked thither to commit
suicide, his shoes would have told a tale of the ground over which he
had come. When his body was found the shoes were clean.[174] Upon this
was based the conclusion that Godfrey had not walked to Primrose Hill
on that day at all. It was clear that he had been murdered in some
other place, that the murderers had then conveyed his body to Primrose
Hill, had transfixed it with his sword, and thrown it into the ditch,
that the dead man might seem to have taken his own life.
The result of the inquest was confirmed by what passed some years
later. In the course of the year 1681 a series of letters were
published in the _Loyal Protestant Intelligencer_, purporting to prove
that Sir Edmund Godfrey had committed suicide. Thompson, Pain, and
Farwell, the publisher and authors of the letters, were tried before
Chief Justice Pemberton on June 20, 1682 for libel and misdemeanour.
The accused attempted to justify their action, but the witnesses whom
they called gave evidence which only established still more firmly the
facts elicitated at the inquest. Belief in the Popish Plot was at this
time on the wane throughout the country, and at court was almost a
sign of disloyalty. The men were tried in the fairest manner possible,
and upon full evidence were convicted. Thompson and Farwell were
pilloried and fined £100 each, and Pain, whose share in the business
had been less than theirs, escaped with a fine.[175] None but those
who were willing to accept L’Estrange’s bad testimony, assertions, and
insinuations could refrain from believing that Godfrey’s death was a
cold-blooded murder. Even some who would have been glad to credit his
suicide were convinced. The king certainly could not be suspected of a
desire to establish belief in the murder. When news of the discovery
of the body first reached him, he thought that Godfrey had killed
himself.[176] But when Dr. Lloyd, who went with Burnet to view the body
at the Whitehouse Inn, brought word of what they had seen, Charles was,
to outward appearance at all events, convinced that this could not have
been the case. He was open enough in his raillery at the witnesses of
the plot, but he never used his witty tongue to turn Godfrey’s murder
into a suicide.[177]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account