The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles IIPollock, John
History
The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles II
Pollock, John
Popish Plot, 1678
was so feeble that it was never even proposed to call the man Child.
An attempt was made to show that Atkins was a Roman Catholic, but
failed ignominiously.[212] The prisoner called Captain Vittells and
one of his men, who proved an alibi in the most decisive manner; the
Attorney-General threw up his case, and the jury without leaving the
bar returned a verdict of not guilty.[213] Sir William Jones was
anxious that no one should go away with the opinion that the king’s
evidence had been disproved. The Lord Chief Justice supported him. He
pointed out that Bedloe had not been contradicted, and that every one
who appeared at the trial might speak the truth and the prisoner yet
be perfectly innocent.[214] What he did not say, and what neither he
nor many others thought, was that Bedloe might equally be telling the
grossest falsehoods.
CHAPTER III
BEDLOE AND PRANCE
The change in the situation had been caused by the appearance of a
witness whose evidence about the murder was of the greatest weight,
and whose position in the intrigues of the Popish Plot has always been
of some obscurity. Bedloe’s information was already of a startling
character. It was as follows. Early in October he had been offered by
two Jesuits, Walsh and Le Fevre, the sum of £4000 to assist in killing
a man “that was a great obstacle to their designs.” He gave his word
that he would do so, but when on Friday, October 11, Le Fevre told
him to be ready at four o’clock the next day to do the business, he
became nervous and failed to be at the place of meeting. On Sunday he
met Le Fevre by accident in Fleet Street, and by appointment joined
him between 8 and 9 o’clock P.M. the next day in the court of Somerset
House. Le Fevre told Bedloe that the man whom he had been engaged to
kill was dead and his corpse lying in the building at that moment.
Bedloe was taken into a small room to see the body. Besides himself
and Le Fevre there were also present Walsh, the man who called himself
Atkins, a gentleman in the household of Lord Bellasis, and a person
whom he took to be one of the attendants in the queen’s chapel. A
cloth was thrown off the body, and by the light of a dark lantern he
recognised the features of Sir Edmund Berry Godfrey. It was agreed to
carry the corpse to Clarendon House, and to take it thence by coach
to the fields at the foot of Primrose Hill. Bedloe promised to return
at eleven o’clock to assist, but went away intending to meddle with
the business no more. The next day he happened to meet Le Fevre in
Lincoln’s Inn Fields. Le Fevre began to rebuke him for breaking his
word. Bedloe answered that he had been unwilling to come because he
had recognised the dead man. Le Fevre bound him to secrecy and then
proceeded to tell him how the murder had been committed. Under pretence
of making a further discovery of the plot, the two Jesuits and Lord
Bellasis’ gentleman had persuaded Godfrey to come into Somerset House
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account