The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles IIPollock, John
History
The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles II
Pollock, John
Popish Plot, 1678
Hill now declared that in the middle of October he had been busy making
arrangements for the move; on the day of Godfrey’s disappearance he was
still occupied with his landlord in drawing up terms of agreement, and
the agreement was not concluded until the Wednesday following.[225]
In addition to his evidence about Godfrey’s murder, Prance made a
statement concerning the plot. Fenwick, Ireland, and Grove, he said,
had told him that “Lord Petre, Lord Bellasis, the Earl of Powis, and
Lord Arundell were to command the army.” As more decisive evidence had
already been given against all these, his information was of little
consequence. He also desired to be set at liberty, that he might be
able to discover some persons connected with the plot whose names were
unknown to him. The request was naturally refused, but Prance was
removed from the dungeon and Hill was confined there in his place.[226]
Within forty-eight hours from this time Prance had recanted his whole
story. On the evening of Sunday, December 29, Captain Richardson, the
keeper of Newgate, received an order of council to bring Prance before
the Lords’ committee for examination. Prance was in a state of great
agitation and begged to be taken to see the king. Charles received him
in the presence of Richardson and Chiffinch, his confidential valet.
Prance fell upon his knees and declared that the whole of his evidence
had been false, that he was innocent of the murder, and the men whom
he had accused as far as he knew were innocent too. The next day he
was taken before the council and persisted that he knew no more of
Godfrey’s murder than was known to the world. He was asked if any one
had been tampering with him and answered, No. Hardly had he been taken
back to Newgate when he begged Captain Richardson to return to the
king and say that all his evidence had been true, and his recantation
false.[227] From this he again departed and reaffirmed his recantation.
He was heavily ironed and a second time imprisoned in the condemned
hole. Here he remained until January 11, 1679, when to complete the
cycle of his contradictions he once more retracted his recantation and
declared that the whole of his original confession was true.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account