The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles IIPollock, John
History
The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles II
Pollock, John
Popish Plot, 1678
Nearly eight years after these events, in the second year of the
reign of King James the Second, Miles Prance pleaded guilty to an
indictment of wilful perjury for having sworn falsely at the trial of
Green, Berry, and Hill.[244] Later, when L’Estrange was writing his
work on _The Mystery of Sir E. B. Godfrey Unfolded_, Prance sent to
him an account of the manner in which his evidence had been procured.
He was, he said, wholly innocent and wholly ignorant of the murder.
Before his arrest he knew no more of Godfrey, Bedloe, or any one else
concerned than was known to the world at large. His arrest took place
upon Saturday, December 21. During the nights of Saturday and Sunday he
lay in irons in the dungeon in Newgate. Early on the Sunday morning he
was disturbed by the entrance of a man, who, as Prance declared, laid
a sheet of paper beside him and went out. Soon after another entered,
set down a candle, and went out. By the light of the candle Prance read
the paper; “wherein,” says L’Estrange, “he found the substance of these
following minutes. So many Popish lords to be mentioned by name; fifty
thousand men to be raised; commissions given out; officers appointed.
Ireland was acquainted with the design; and Bedloe’s evidence against
Godfrey was summed up and abstracted in it too. There were suggestions
in it that Prance must undoubtedly be privy to the plot, with words to
this purpose, you had better confess than be hanged.” In the evening
of the same day he was taken to Shaftesbury’s house and examined by
the earl. The Whig leader threatened him with hanging if he would
not confess and acquiesce in what had been suggested to him in the
paper. He could resist no longer, he said, “and so framed a pretended
discovery in part, with a promise to speak out more at large if he
might have his pardon.” A paper containing this was given him to sign,
and he was sent back to Newgate, where he made a formal confession the
next day. Clearly, thought Prance, the men who came into his cell, and
left instructions for the evidence which he was to give and a light by
which to read them, had acted under orders from Shaftesbury.[245] This
is what Prance and L’Estrange had to say about this first confession.
Before examining it further it will be proper to consider Prance’s
condition between that time and the date when after numerous manœuvres
he finally returned to it. On December 30 he appeared before the
council and recanted his confession. For nine days there seems to have
been no development. Prance lay in the dungeon and adhered to his
last statement. But on January 8 Captain Richardson, the keeper of
Newgate, and his servant, Charles Cooper, appeared before a committee
of the privy council with information that Prance was feigning madness.
When he was fettered he behaved the more sensibly. It was ordered
accordingly that he should be kept in irons and that Dr. Lloyd, the
Dean of Bangor, should be asked to visit and converse with him.[246]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account