The Popular Science Monthly, July, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900Various
Science
The Popular Science Monthly, July, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
If the practice of separating the visible stars into only six orders
of magnitude were continued without change, we should still have
the anomaly of including in one class stars of markedly different
degrees of brightness. Some more than twice as bright as others would
be designated of the same magnitude. Hence, to give quantitative
exactness to the results, a magnitude is regarded as a quantity which
may have any value whatever, and may be expressed by decimals--tenths
or even hundredths. Thus, we may have stars of magnitude 5.0, 5.1,
5.2, etc., or we may even subdivide yet farther and speak of stars
having magnitudes 5.11, 5.12, etc. Unfortunately, however, there
is as yet no way known of determining the amount of light received
from a star except by an estimate of its effect upon the eye. Two
stars are regarded as equal when they appear to the eye of equal
brilliancy. In such a case the judgment is very uncertain. Hence,
observers have endeavored to give greater precision to it by the use
of photometers,--instruments for measuring quantities of light. But
even with this instrument the observer must depend upon an estimated
equality of light as judged by the eye. The light from one star is
increased or diminished in a known proportion until it appears equal to
that of another star, which may be an artificial one produced by the
flame of a candle. The proportion of increase or diminution shows the
difference of magnitude between the two stars.
As we proceed to place the subject of photometric measures of star
light on this precise basis we find the problem to be a complex one.
In the first place not all the rays which come from a star are visible
to our eyes as light. But all the radiance, visible or invisible,
may be absorbed by a dark surface, and will then show its effect by
heating that surface. The most perfect measure of the radiance of a
star would therefore be the amount of heat which it conveys, because
this expresses what is going on in the body better than the amount of
visible light can do. But unfortunately the heating effect of the rays
from a star is far below what can be measured or even indicated by any
known instrument. We are therefore obliged to abandon any thought of
determining the total amount of radiation and confine ourselves to that
portion which we call light.
Here, when we aim at precision, we find that light, as we understand
it, is properly measured only by its effect on the optic nerve, and
there is no way of measuring this effect except by estimation. Thus,
all the photometer can do is to give us the means of increasing or
diminishing the light from one star, so that we can make it equal by
estimation to that from some other star or source of light.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account