The Popular Science Monthly, June, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900Various
Science
The Popular Science Monthly, June, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
Starting from the ‘virus fixe’ obtained as above, a method of double
inoculation was worked out, one with an attenuated virus prepared
from the ‘virus fixe,’ and another with the latter itself. The two
‘vaccines,’ when inoculated successively into Guinea pigs, protected
them against all possible forms of cholera infection. The vaccines
were cultivated on a solid medium, and when the crop of microbes was
ready at the end of some twenty-four hours, they were washed off the
surface of the medium and used as a kind of medicinal plant. It was
found that the substances contained in the microbes preserved to a
great extent their immunizing properties even when the microbes were
killed by some delicate processes not affecting considerably their
chemical constitution. The washings could, therefore, be prepared
in dilute solutions of carbolic acid, and employed in the form of
preserved vaccines. In 1892 and in the beginning of 1893 I made a
series of experiments in Paris, in Netley, in London, in Cambridge,
and in Calcutta, with these carbolized cholera vaccines, which had
been preserved in sealed tubes for a period of six to seven months,
and it was possible to show the protective effect of the method on
animals as conclusively as Pasteur had done in the demonstration at
Pouilly-le-Fort with anthrax. For the inoculation in man, however, I
decided to use at first only unaltered living vaccines, as much more
promising than the dead ones, especially from the point of view of the
durability of the effect.
[_To be concluded._]
PROFESSOR EWART’S PENYCUIK EXPERIMENTS.[A]
[A] Abstract from an article in the Quarterly Review discussing
Professor Ewart’s ‘Experimental Investigations on
Telegony,’ read before the Royal Society last year, and his
book, ‘The Penycuik Experiments,’ published by Messrs. A. &
D. Black.
The views and works of Darwin have influenced in an unexpected way
the nature of the work carried on by biological investigators during
the latter end of this fast-dying century. To a great extent, while
generally holding the doctrines he held, they have forsaken his methods
of inquiry.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account