The Popular Science Monthly, June, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900Various
Science
The Popular Science Monthly, June, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
This inability of ours to give a good physical explanation of
gravitation has led numerous paradoxers to doubt or even deny that
there is any such thing. But fortunately we have a simple laboratory
experiment that helps us. Unexplained it may ever remain, but that
there can be attraction between physical objects connected by no
visible link is proved by the behavior of an ordinary magnet. Place
a small piece of steel or iron near a magnetized bar, and it will at
once be so strongly attracted that it will actually fly to the magnet.
Any one who has seen this simple experiment can never again deny the
possibility at least of the law of attraction as stated by Newton. Its
possibility once admitted, the fact that it can predict the motions
of all the planets, even shown to the minutest details, transforms
the possibility of its birth into a certainty as strong as any human
certainty can ever be.
But this demonstration of Newton’s law is limited strictly to the
solar system itself. We may indeed reason by analogy, and take for
granted that a law which holds within our immediate neighborhood is
extremely likely to be true also of the entire visible universe. But
men of science are loath to reason thus; and hence the fascination
of researches in cosmic astronomy. Analogy points out the path. The
astronomer is not slow to follow; but he seeks ever to establish upon
incontrovertible evidence those truths which at first only his daring
imagination had led him to half suspect. If we are to extend the law
of gravitation to the utmost, we must be careful to consider the law
itself in its most complete form. A heavenly body like the sun is
often said to govern the motions of its family of planets; but such a
statement is not strictly accurate. The governing body is no despot;
’tis an abject slave of law and order, as much as the tiniest of
attendant planets. The action of gravitation is mutual, and no cosmic
body can attract another without being itself in turn subject to that
other’s gravitational action. If there were in our solar system but
two bodies, sun and planet, we should find each one pursuing a path
in space under the influence of the other’s attraction. These two
paths or orbits would be oval, and if the sun and planet were equally
massive, the orbits would be exactly alike, both in shape and size.
But if the sun were far larger than the planet, the orbits would still
be similar in form, but the one traversed by the larger body would
be small. For it is not reasonable to expect a little planet to keep
the big sun moving with a velocity as great as that derived by itself
from the attraction of the larger orb. Whenever the preponderance of
the larger body is extremely great, its orbit will be correspondingly
insignificant in size. This is in fact the case with our own sun.
So massive is it in comparison with the planets, that the orbit is
too small to reveal its actual existence without the aid of our most
refined instruments.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account