The Popular Science Monthly, October, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900Various
History
The Popular Science Monthly, October, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
The main feature of the stars of the first class is that we are under
no necessity of supposing any actual change in the amount of light
which they emit. Their apparent variations are purely the effect of
perspective, arising from the various aspects which they present to us
during their revolution round each other. If we could change our point
of view so that the plane of the orbit of Algol’s planet no longer
passed near our system, Algol would no longer be a variable star.
Under the same circumstances the apparent variations in a star of the
Beta Lyræ type would cease to be noticeable, if they did not disappear
entirely.
The stars of this class are also distinguished by the uniformity and
regularity with which they go through their cycle of change.
The stars of the other class, which we may call the Omicron Ceti type,
are different not only in respect to the length of the period, but
in the character of the variation. There are certain general laws of
variation and irregularities of brightness which stars of this class go
through. Starting from the time of the minimum, the increase of light
is at first very slow. It grows more and more rapid as the maximum is
approached, in which time there may be as great an increase in two or
three days as there formerly was in a month. The diminution of light
is generally slower than the increase. The magnitude at corresponding
times in different periods may be very different. Thus, as we have
already remarked, Omicron Ceti is ten times as bright at some maxima as
it is at others. The periods also, so far as they have been made out,
vary more widely than those of stars of the other type.
The idea has sometimes been entertained that these variations of
light are due to a revolution of the star on its axis. A very little
consideration will, however, show that this explanation cannot be
valid. However bright a star might be on one side, or however dark
on the other, any one region of its surface would be visible to us
half the time and a change of brightness from different degrees of
brilliancy on different sides would be gradual and regular.
It is not impossible that the variability may be in some way connected
with the action of a body revolving round the star. This seems to be
the case with Eta Aquilæ. The radial motion of this object shows the
existence of a dark body revolving round it in the same period as that
of the star’s variation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account