The Popular Science Monthly, October, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900Various
History
The Popular Science Monthly, October, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
From what has been said, it will be seen that, although a sharp line
cannot be drawn, there seems to be some distinction between the stars
of short and long periods. The number of stars which have been known to
belong to the first class is quite small, only about fifteen, all told.
On the other hand, there are still left some stars having a period less
than ten days, which are otherwise not distinguishable from the Omicron
Ceti type. It seems quite likely that the variations in the periods of
these stars are, in some way, connected with the revolution of bright
or dark bodies round them.
They also vary more widely than those of stars of the other two types.
This might easily happen in the case of stars really variable through
a cycle of changes going on in consequence of the action of interior
causes.
The periodic stars of short period, which have not been recognized as
of the Algol or Beta Lyræ type, form an interesting subject of study.
Although the separation between them and the stars of long period is
not sharp, it seems likely to have some element of reality in it. But
no conclusions on the subject can be reached until the light-curves of
a large number of them are carefully drawn; and this requires an amount
of patient and accurate observation which cannot be carried out for
years to come.
SUSPECTED VARIATIONS IN THE COLOR OF STARS.
The question whether certain stars vary in color without materially
changing their brightness has sometimes been raised. This was at one
time supposed to be the case with one of the stars of Ursa Major. This
suspected variation has not, however, been confirmed, and it does not
seem likely that any such changes take place in the color of stars not
otherwise variable.
POSSIBLE SECULAR VARIATIONS IN THE BRILLIANCY OF STARS.
All the variations we have hitherto considered take place with such
rapidity that they can be observed by comparisons embracing but a short
interval of time--a few days or months at the outside. A somewhat
different question of great importance is still left open. May not
individual stars be subject to a secular variation of brilliancy,
meaning by this term a change which would not be sensible in the course
of only one generation of men, but admitting of being brought out by
a comparison of the brightness of the stars at widely distant epochs?
Is it certain that, in the case of stars which we do not recognize
as variable, no change has taken place since the time of Hipparchus
and Ptolemy? This question has been investigated by C. S. Pierce and
others. The conclusion reached is that no real evidence of any change
can be gathered. The discrepancies are no greater than might arise from
errors of estimates.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account