The Popular Science Monthly, October, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900Various
History
The Popular Science Monthly, October, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
The third successful attempt was made by Henderson, of England,
astronomer at the Cape of Good Hope. He found from meridian
observations that the star Alpha Centauri had a parallax of about
1″. This is a double star of the first magnitude, which, being only
30° from the south celestial pole, never rises in our latitudes. Its
nearness to us was indicated not only by its magnitude, but also by its
considerable proper motion.
Although subsequent investigation has shown the parallax of this body
to be less than that found by Henderson, it is, up to the time of
writing, the nearest star whose distance has been ascertained. The
extreme difficulty of detecting movements so slight as those we have
described, when they take six months to go through their phases, will
be obvious to the reader. He would be still more impressed with it
when, looking through a powerful telescope at any star, he sees how it
flickers in consequence of the continual motions going on in the air
through which it is seen and how difficult it must be to fix any point
of reference from which to measure the change of direction.
The latter is the capital difficulty in measuring the parallax. How
shall we know that a star has changed its direction by a fraction of a
second in the course of six months? There must be for this purpose some
standard direction from which we can measure.
The most certain of these standard directions is that of the earth’s
axis of rotation. It is true that this direction varies in the course
of the year, but the amount of the variation is known with great
precision, so that it can be properly allowed for in the reduction
of the observations. The angle between the direction of a star and
that of the earth’s axis, the latter direction being represented by
the celestial pole, can be measured with our meridian instruments. It
is, in fact, the north polar distance of the star, or the complement
of its declination. If, therefore, the astronomer could measure the
declination of a star with great precision throughout the entire year,
he would be able to determine its parallax by a comparison of the
measures. But it is found impossible in practice to make measures of so
long an arc with the necessary precision. The uncertain and changing
effect of the varying seasons and different temperatures of day and
night upon the air and the instrument almost masks the parallax. After
several attempts with the finest instruments, handled with the utmost
skill, to determine stellar parallax from the declinations of the
stars, the method has been practically abandoned.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account