The Popular Science Monthly, October, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900Various
History
The Popular Science Monthly, October, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
The method now practiced is that of relative parallax. By this method
the standard direction is that of a small star apparently alongside one
whose parallax is to be measured, but, presumably, so much farther
away that it may be regarded as having no parallax. In this assumption
lies the weak point of the method. Can we be sure that the smaller
stars are really without appreciable parallax? Until recent times it
was generally supposed that the magnitude of the stars afforded the
best index to their relative distances. If the stars were of the same
intrinsic brilliancy, the amount of light received from them would, as
already pointed out, have been inversely as the square of the distance.
Although there was no reason to suppose that any such equality really
existed, it would still remain true that, in the general average, the
brighter stars must be nearer to us than the fainter ones. But when the
proper motions of stars came to be investigated, it was found that the
amount of this motion afforded a better index to the distance than the
magnitude did.
The diversity of actual or linear motion is not so wide as that of
absolute brilliancy. Stars have, therefore, in recent times, been
selected for parallax very largely on account of their proper motion,
without respect to their brightness. It is now considered quite safe to
assume that the small stars without proper motion are so far away that
their parallax is insensible.
Ever since the time of Bessel the experience of practical astronomers
has tended toward the conclusion that the best instrument for delicate
measurements like these is the heliometer. This is an equatorial
telescope of which the object glass is divided along a diameter into
two semicircles, which can slide along each other. Each half of the
object glass forms a separate image of any star at which the telescope
may be pointed. By sliding the two halves along each other, the images
can be brought together or separated to any extent. If there are two
stars in proximity, the image of one star made by one-half of the
glass can be brought into coincidence with that of the other star made
by the other half. The sliding of the two halves to bring about this
coincidence affords a scale of measurement for the angular distance of
the two stars.
The most noteworthy forward steps in improving the heliometer are due
to the celebrated instrument-makers of Hamburg, the Messrs. Repsold,
aided by the suggestions of Dr. David Gill, astronomer at the Cape of
Good Hope. The latter, in connection with his coadjutor, Elkin, made an
equally important step in the art of managing the instrument and hence
in determining the parallax of stars. The best results yet attained are
those of these two observers and of Peter, of Germany.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account